Commit 494e8489 authored by Mahesh Bandewar's avatar Mahesh Bandewar Committed by David S. Miller

ipvlan: Fix failure path in dev registration during link creation

When newlink creation fails at device-registration, the port->count
is decremented twice. Francesco Ruggeri (fruggeri@arista.com) found
this issue in Macvlan and the same exists in IPvlan driver too.

While fixing this issue I noticed another issue of missing unregister
in case of failure, so adding it to the fix which is similar to the
macvlan fix by Francesco in commit 30837960 ("macvlan: fix failure
during registration v3")
Reported-by: default avatarFrancesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 222e4d0b
......@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static int ipvlan_init(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct ipvl_dev *ipvlan = netdev_priv(dev);
const struct net_device *phy_dev = ipvlan->phy_dev;
struct ipvl_port *port = ipvlan->port;
dev->state = (dev->state & ~IPVLAN_STATE_MASK) |
(phy_dev->state & IPVLAN_STATE_MASK);
......@@ -128,6 +129,8 @@ static int ipvlan_init(struct net_device *dev)
if (!ipvlan->pcpu_stats)
return -ENOMEM;
port->count += 1;
return 0;
}
......@@ -481,27 +484,21 @@ static int ipvlan_link_new(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
dev->priv_flags |= IFF_IPVLAN_SLAVE;
port->count += 1;
err = register_netdevice(dev);
if (err < 0)
goto ipvlan_destroy_port;
return err;
err = netdev_upper_dev_link(phy_dev, dev);
if (err)
goto ipvlan_destroy_port;
if (err) {
unregister_netdevice(dev);
return err;
}
list_add_tail_rcu(&ipvlan->pnode, &port->ipvlans);
ipvlan_set_port_mode(port, mode);
netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(phy_dev, dev);
return 0;
ipvlan_destroy_port:
port->count -= 1;
if (!port->count)
ipvlan_port_destroy(phy_dev);
return err;
}
static void ipvlan_link_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment