Merge branch 'tls-splice_read-fixes'

Jakub Kicinski says:

====================
tls: splice_read fixes

As I work my way to unlocked and zero-copy TLS Rx the obvious bugs
in the splice_read implementation get harder and harder to ignore.
This is to say the fixes here are discovered by code inspection,
I'm not aware of anyone actually using splice_read.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211124232557.2039757-1-kuba@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

net/tls/tls_main.c

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(tcpv6_prot_mutex);
 static const struct proto *saved_tcpv4_prot;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(tcpv4_prot_mutex);
 static struct proto tls_prots[TLS_NUM_PROTS][TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG];
-static struct proto_ops tls_sw_proto_ops;
+static struct proto_ops tls_proto_ops[TLS_NUM_PROTS][TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG];
 static void build_protos(struct proto prot[TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG],
 			 const struct proto *base);
 
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ void update_sk_prot(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot,
 		   &tls_prots[ip_ver][ctx->tx_conf][ctx->rx_conf]);
+	WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_socket->ops,
+		   &tls_proto_ops[ip_ver][ctx->tx_conf][ctx->rx_conf]);
 }
 
 int wait_on_pending_writer(struct sock *sk, long *timeo)
@@ -669,8 +671,6 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
 	if (tx) {
 		ctx->sk_write_space = sk->sk_write_space;
 		sk->sk_write_space = tls_write_space;
-	} else {
-		sk->sk_socket->ops = &tls_sw_proto_ops;
 	}
 	goto out;
 
@@ -728,6 +728,39 @@ struct tls_context *tls_ctx_create(struct sock *sk)
 	return ctx;
 }
 
+static void build_proto_ops(struct proto_ops ops[TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG],
+			    const struct proto_ops *base)
+{
+	ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE] = *base;
+
+	ops[TLS_SW  ][TLS_BASE] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE];
+	ops[TLS_SW  ][TLS_BASE].sendpage_locked	= tls_sw_sendpage_locked;
+
+	ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW  ] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE];
+	ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW  ].splice_read	= tls_sw_splice_read;
+
+	ops[TLS_SW  ][TLS_SW  ] = ops[TLS_SW  ][TLS_BASE];
+	ops[TLS_SW  ][TLS_SW  ].splice_read	= tls_sw_splice_read;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE
+	ops[TLS_HW  ][TLS_BASE] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE];
+	ops[TLS_HW  ][TLS_BASE].sendpage_locked	= NULL;
+
+	ops[TLS_HW  ][TLS_SW  ] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW  ];
+	ops[TLS_HW  ][TLS_SW  ].sendpage_locked	= NULL;
+
+	ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_HW  ] = ops[TLS_BASE][TLS_SW  ];
+
+	ops[TLS_SW  ][TLS_HW  ] = ops[TLS_SW  ][TLS_SW  ];
+
+	ops[TLS_HW  ][TLS_HW  ] = ops[TLS_HW  ][TLS_SW  ];
+	ops[TLS_HW  ][TLS_HW  ].sendpage_locked	= NULL;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_TLS_TOE
+	ops[TLS_HW_RECORD][TLS_HW_RECORD] = *base;
+#endif
+}
+
 static void tls_build_proto(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	int ip_ver = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TLSV6 : TLSV4;
@@ -739,6 +772,8 @@ static void tls_build_proto(struct sock *sk)
 		mutex_lock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
 		if (likely(prot != saved_tcpv6_prot)) {
 			build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV6], prot);
+			build_proto_ops(tls_proto_ops[TLSV6],
+					sk->sk_socket->ops);
 			smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv6_prot, prot);
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&tcpv6_prot_mutex);
@@ -749,6 +784,8 @@ static void tls_build_proto(struct sock *sk)
 		mutex_lock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
 		if (likely(prot != saved_tcpv4_prot)) {
 			build_protos(tls_prots[TLSV4], prot);
+			build_proto_ops(tls_proto_ops[TLSV4],
+					sk->sk_socket->ops);
 			smp_store_release(&saved_tcpv4_prot, prot);
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&tcpv4_prot_mutex);
@@ -959,10 +996,6 @@ static int __init tls_register(void)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	tls_sw_proto_ops = inet_stream_ops;
-	tls_sw_proto_ops.splice_read = tls_sw_splice_read;
-	tls_sw_proto_ops.sendpage_locked   = tls_sw_sendpage_locked;
-
 	tls_device_init();
 	tcp_register_ulp(&tcp_tls_ulp_ops);
 

net/tls/tls_sw.c

@@ -2005,6 +2005,7 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	ssize_t copied = 0;
+	bool from_queue;
 	int err = 0;
 	long timeo;
 	int chunk;
@@ -2014,25 +2015,28 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 
 	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK);
 
-	skb = tls_wait_data(sk, NULL, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK, timeo, &err);
-	if (!skb)
-		goto splice_read_end;
-
-	if (!ctx->decrypted) {
-		err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL, &chunk, &zc, false);
-
-		/* splice does not support reading control messages */
-		if (ctx->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA) {
-			err = -EINVAL;
+	from_queue = !skb_queue_empty(&ctx->rx_list);
+	if (from_queue) {
+		skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list);
+	} else {
+		skb = tls_wait_data(sk, NULL, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK, timeo,
+				    &err);
+		if (!skb)
 			goto splice_read_end;
-		}
 
+		err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL, &chunk, &zc, false);
 		if (err < 0) {
 			tls_err_abort(sk, -EBADMSG);
 			goto splice_read_end;
 		}
-		ctx->decrypted = 1;
 	}
+
+	/* splice does not support reading control messages */
+	if (ctx->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto splice_read_end;
+	}
+
 	rxm = strp_msg(skb);
 
 	chunk = min_t(unsigned int, rxm->full_len, len);
@@ -2040,7 +2044,17 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 	if (copied < 0)
 		goto splice_read_end;
 
-	tls_sw_advance_skb(sk, skb, copied);
+	if (!from_queue) {
+		ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
+		__strp_unpause(&ctx->strp);
+	}
+	if (chunk < rxm->full_len) {
+		__skb_queue_head(&ctx->rx_list, skb);
+		rxm->offset += len;
+		rxm->full_len -= len;
+	} else {
+		consume_skb(skb);
+	}
 
 splice_read_end:
 	release_sock(sk);