Commit 49e236bc authored by Richard Weinberger's avatar Richard Weinberger Committed by Artem Bityutskiy

UBI: bugfix in ubi_wl_flush()

Use the _safe variant because we're iterating over a list where items get
deleted and freed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: default avatarArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
parent 4df38926
...@@ -1718,12 +1718,12 @@ int ubi_wl_flush(struct ubi_device *ubi, int vol_id, int lnum) ...@@ -1718,12 +1718,12 @@ int ubi_wl_flush(struct ubi_device *ubi, int vol_id, int lnum)
vol_id, lnum, ubi->works_count); vol_id, lnum, ubi->works_count);
while (found) { while (found) {
struct ubi_work *wrk; struct ubi_work *wrk, *tmp;
found = 0; found = 0;
down_read(&ubi->work_sem); down_read(&ubi->work_sem);
spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock); spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
list_for_each_entry(wrk, &ubi->works, list) { list_for_each_entry_safe(wrk, tmp, &ubi->works, list) {
if ((vol_id == UBI_ALL || wrk->vol_id == vol_id) && if ((vol_id == UBI_ALL || wrk->vol_id == vol_id) &&
(lnum == UBI_ALL || wrk->lnum == lnum)) { (lnum == UBI_ALL || wrk->lnum == lnum)) {
list_del(&wrk->list); list_del(&wrk->list);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment