Commit 4c4e3731 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/wake_q: Fix wakeup ordering for wake_q

Notable cmpxchg() does not provide ordering when it fails, however
wake_q_add() requires ordering in this specific case too. Without this
it would be possible for the concurrent wakeup to not observe our
prior state.

Andrea Parri provided:

  C wake_up_q-wake_q_add

  {
	int next = 0;
	int y = 0;
  }

  P0(int *next, int *y)
  {
	int r0;

	/* in wake_up_q() */

	WRITE_ONCE(*next, 1);   /* node->next = NULL */
	smp_mb();               /* implied by wake_up_process() */
	r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
  }

  P1(int *next, int *y)
  {
	int r1;

	/* in wake_q_add() */

	WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);      /* wake_cond = true */
	smp_mb__before_atomic();
	r1 = cmpxchg_relaxed(next, 1, 2);
  }

  exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r1=0)

  This "exists" clause cannot be satisfied according to the LKMM:

  Test wake_up_q-wake_q_add Allowed
  States 3
  0:r0=0; 1:r1=1;
  0:r0=1; 1:r1=0;
  0:r0=1; 1:r1=1;
  No
  Witnesses
  Positive: 0 Negative: 3
  Condition exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r1=0)
  Observation wake_up_q-wake_q_add Never 0 3
Reported-by: default avatarYongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent e6018c0f
...@@ -417,10 +417,11 @@ void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task) ...@@ -417,10 +417,11 @@ void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
* its already queued (either by us or someone else) and will get the * its already queued (either by us or someone else) and will get the
* wakeup due to that. * wakeup due to that.
* *
* This cmpxchg() executes a full barrier, which pairs with the full * In order to ensure that a pending wakeup will observe our pending
* barrier executed by the wakeup in wake_up_q(). * state, even in the failed case, an explicit smp_mb() must be used.
*/ */
if (cmpxchg(&node->next, NULL, WAKE_Q_TAIL)) smp_mb__before_atomic();
if (cmpxchg_relaxed(&node->next, NULL, WAKE_Q_TAIL))
return; return;
get_task_struct(task); get_task_struct(task);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment