Commit 4c546592 authored by Daeho Jeong's avatar Daeho Jeong Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling

We already allocate delalloc blocks before changing the inode mode into
"per-file data journal" mode to prevent delalloc blocks from remaining
not allocated, but another issue concerned with "BH_Unwritten" status
still exists. For example, by fallocate(), several buffers' status
change into "BH_Unwritten", but these buffers cannot be processed by
ext4_alloc_da_blocks(). So, they still remain in unwritten status after
per-file data journaling is enabled and they cannot be changed into
written status any more and, if they are journaled and eventually
checkpointed, these unwritten buffer will cause a kernel panic by the
below BUG_ON() function of submit_bh_wbc() when they are submitted
during checkpointing.

static int submit_bh_wbc(int rw, struct buffer_head *bh,...
{
        ...
        BUG_ON(buffer_unwritten(bh));

Moreover, when "dioread_nolock" option is enabled, the status of a
buffer is changed into "BH_Unwritten" after write_begin() completes and
the "BH_Unwritten" status will be cleared after I/O is done. Therefore,
if a buffer's status is changed into unwrutten but the buffer's I/O is
not submitted and completed, it can cause the same problem after
enabling per-file data journaling. You can easily generate this bug by
executing the following command.

./kvm-xfstests -C 10000 -m nodelalloc,dioread_nolock generic/269

To resolve these problems and define a boundary between the previous
mode and per-file data journaling mode, we need to flush and wait all
the I/O of buffers of a file before enabling per-file data journaling
of the file.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent 7b808191
...@@ -5452,22 +5452,29 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val) ...@@ -5452,22 +5452,29 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val)
return 0; return 0;
if (is_journal_aborted(journal)) if (is_journal_aborted(journal))
return -EROFS; return -EROFS;
/* We have to allocate physical blocks for delalloc blocks
* before flushing journal. otherwise delalloc blocks can not
* be allocated any more. even more truncate on delalloc blocks
* could trigger BUG by flushing delalloc blocks in journal.
* There is no delalloc block in non-journal data mode.
*/
if (val && test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC)) {
err = ext4_alloc_da_blocks(inode);
if (err < 0)
return err;
}
/* Wait for all existing dio workers */ /* Wait for all existing dio workers */
ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio(inode); ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio(inode);
inode_dio_wait(inode); inode_dio_wait(inode);
/*
* Before flushing the journal and switching inode's aops, we have
* to flush all dirty data the inode has. There can be outstanding
* delayed allocations, there can be unwritten extents created by
* fallocate or buffered writes in dioread_nolock mode covered by
* dirty data which can be converted only after flushing the dirty
* data (and journalled aops don't know how to handle these cases).
*/
if (val) {
down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
err = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
if (err < 0) {
up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
ext4_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode);
return err;
}
}
jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal); jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal);
/* /*
...@@ -5492,6 +5499,8 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val) ...@@ -5492,6 +5499,8 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val)
ext4_set_aops(inode); ext4_set_aops(inode);
jbd2_journal_unlock_updates(journal); jbd2_journal_unlock_updates(journal);
if (val)
up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
ext4_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode); ext4_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode);
/* Finally we can mark the inode as dirty. */ /* Finally we can mark the inode as dirty. */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment