drm/i915/pmu: Fix sleep under atomic in RC6 readout
We are not allowed to call intel_runtime_pm_get from the PMU counter read callback since the former can sleep, and the latter is running under IRQ context. To workaround this, we record the last known RC6 and while runtime suspended estimate its increase by querying the runtime PM core timestamps. Downside of this approach is that we can temporarily lose a chunk of RC6 time, from the last PMU read-out to runtime suspend entry, but that will eventually catch up, once device comes back online and in the presence of PMU queries. Also, we have to be careful not to overshoot the RC6 estimate, so once resumed after a period of approximation, we only update the counter once it catches up. With the observation that RC6 is increasing while the device is suspended, this should not pose a problem and can only cause slight inaccuracies due clock base differences. v2: Simplify by estimating on top of PM core counters. (Imre) Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104943 Fixes: 6060b6ae ("drm/i915/pmu: Add RC6 residency metrics") Testcase: igt/perf_pmu/rc6-runtime-pm Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206183311.17924-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com (cherry picked from commit 1fe699e3) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180213095747.2424-3-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment