Commit 4de8ecee authored by Vinothkumar Raja's avatar Vinothkumar Raja Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm btree: fix for dm_btree_find_lowest_key()

commit 7d1fedb6 upstream.

dm_btree_find_lowest_key() is giving incorrect results.  find_key()
traverses the btree correctly for finding the highest key, but there is
an error in the way it traverses the btree for retrieving the lowest
key.  dm_btree_find_lowest_key() fetches the first key of the rightmost
block of the btree instead of fetching the first key from the leftmost
block.

Fix this by conditionally passing the correct parameter to value64()
based on the @find_highest flag.
Signed-off-by: default avatarErez Zadok <ezk@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVinothkumar Raja <vinraja@cs.stonybrook.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNidhi Panpalia <npanpalia@cs.stonybrook.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 5db8f42b
......@@ -897,8 +897,12 @@ static int find_key(struct ro_spine *s, dm_block_t block, bool find_highest,
else
*result_key = le64_to_cpu(ro_node(s)->keys[0]);
if (next_block || flags & INTERNAL_NODE)
block = value64(ro_node(s), i);
if (next_block || flags & INTERNAL_NODE) {
if (find_highest)
block = value64(ro_node(s), i);
else
block = value64(ro_node(s), 0);
}
} while (flags & INTERNAL_NODE);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment