Commit 4e8313e5 authored by Filipe Manana's avatar Filipe Manana Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: simplify variables in btrfs_block_rsv_refill()

At btrfs_block_rsv_refill(), there's no point in initializing the
'num_bytes' variable to 0 and then, after taking the block reserve's
spinlock, initializing it to the value of the 'min_reserved' parameter.

So just get rid of the 'num_bytes' local variable and rename the
'min_reserved' parameter to 'num_bytes'.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 4a6f5cca
......@@ -242,17 +242,15 @@ int btrfs_block_rsv_check(struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, int min_percent)
}
int btrfs_block_rsv_refill(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 min_reserved,
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 num_bytes,
enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush)
{
u64 num_bytes = 0;
int ret = -ENOSPC;
if (!block_rsv)
return 0;
spin_lock(&block_rsv->lock);
num_bytes = min_reserved;
if (block_rsv->reserved >= num_bytes)
ret = 0;
else
......
......@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ int btrfs_block_rsv_add(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush);
int btrfs_block_rsv_check(struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, int min_percent);
int btrfs_block_rsv_refill(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 min_reserved,
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 num_bytes,
enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush);
int btrfs_block_rsv_migrate(struct btrfs_block_rsv *src_rsv,
struct btrfs_block_rsv *dst_rsv, u64 num_bytes,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment