Commit 500ceed8 authored by Nikolay Borisov's avatar Nikolay Borisov Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: Remove find_raid56_stripe_len

find_raid56_stripe_len statically returns SZ_64K which equals BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN.
It's sole caller is __btrfs_alloc_chunk and it assigns the return value to ai
variable which is already set to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN. So remove the function
invocation altogether and remove the function itself. Also remove the variable
since it's only aliasing BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN and use the define directly. Use
the occassion to simplify the rounding down of stripe_size now that the value
we want it to align is a power of 2.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 47f08b96
...@@ -4584,12 +4584,6 @@ static int btrfs_cmp_device_info(const void *a, const void *b) ...@@ -4584,12 +4584,6 @@ static int btrfs_cmp_device_info(const void *a, const void *b)
return 0; return 0;
} }
static u32 find_raid56_stripe_len(u32 data_devices, u32 dev_stripe_target)
{
/* TODO allow them to set a preferred stripe size */
return SZ_64K;
}
static void check_raid56_incompat_flag(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 type) static void check_raid56_incompat_flag(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 type)
{ {
if (!(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)) if (!(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK))
...@@ -4632,7 +4626,6 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ...@@ -4632,7 +4626,6 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 max_chunk_size; u64 max_chunk_size;
u64 stripe_size; u64 stripe_size;
u64 num_bytes; u64 num_bytes;
u64 raid_stripe_len = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
int ndevs; int ndevs;
int i; int i;
int j; int j;
...@@ -4767,16 +4760,11 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ...@@ -4767,16 +4760,11 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
*/ */
data_stripes = num_stripes / ncopies; data_stripes = num_stripes / ncopies;
if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5) { if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5)
raid_stripe_len = find_raid56_stripe_len(ndevs - 1,
info->stripesize);
data_stripes = num_stripes - 1; data_stripes = num_stripes - 1;
}
if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) { if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
raid_stripe_len = find_raid56_stripe_len(ndevs - 2,
info->stripesize);
data_stripes = num_stripes - 2; data_stripes = num_stripes - 2;
}
/* /*
* Use the number of data stripes to figure out how big this chunk * Use the number of data stripes to figure out how big this chunk
...@@ -4801,8 +4789,7 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ...@@ -4801,8 +4789,7 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, dev_stripes); stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, dev_stripes);
/* align to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN */ /* align to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN */
stripe_size = div64_u64(stripe_size, raid_stripe_len); stripe_size = round_down(stripe_size, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN);
stripe_size *= raid_stripe_len;
map = kmalloc(map_lookup_size(num_stripes), GFP_NOFS); map = kmalloc(map_lookup_size(num_stripes), GFP_NOFS);
if (!map) { if (!map) {
...@@ -4820,9 +4807,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ...@@ -4820,9 +4807,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
} }
} }
map->sector_size = info->sectorsize; map->sector_size = info->sectorsize;
map->stripe_len = raid_stripe_len; map->stripe_len = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
map->io_align = raid_stripe_len; map->io_align = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
map->io_width = raid_stripe_len; map->io_width = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
map->type = type; map->type = type;
map->sub_stripes = sub_stripes; map->sub_stripes = sub_stripes;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment