Commit 52875a04 authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: verifier: remove dead code

Instead of overwriting dead code with jmp -1 instructions
remove it completely for root.  Adjust verifier state and
line info appropriately.

v2:
 - adjust func_info (Alexei);
 - make sure first instruction retains line info (Alexei).
v4: (Yonghong)
 - remove unnecessary if (!insn to remove) checks;
 - always keep last line info if first live instruction lacks one.
v5: (Martin Lau)
 - improve and clarify comments.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent e2ae4ca2
...@@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_dump_raw_ok(void) ...@@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_dump_raw_ok(void)
struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len); const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len);
int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt);
void bpf_clear_redirect_map(struct bpf_map *map); void bpf_clear_redirect_map(struct bpf_map *map);
......
...@@ -462,6 +462,18 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, ...@@ -462,6 +462,18 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
return prog_adj; return prog_adj;
} }
int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
{
/* Branch offsets can't overflow when program is shrinking, no need
* to call bpf_adj_branches(..., true) here
*/
memmove(prog->insnsi + off, prog->insnsi + off + cnt,
sizeof(struct bpf_insn) * (prog->len - off - cnt));
prog->len -= cnt;
return WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false));
}
void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del_subprogs(struct bpf_prog *fp) void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del_subprogs(struct bpf_prog *fp)
{ {
int i; int i;
......
...@@ -6432,6 +6432,150 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of ...@@ -6432,6 +6432,150 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of
return new_prog; return new_prog;
} }
static int adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
u32 off, u32 cnt)
{
int i, j;
/* find first prog starting at or after off (first to remove) */
for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++)
if (env->subprog_info[i].start >= off)
break;
/* find first prog starting at or after off + cnt (first to stay) */
for (j = i; j < env->subprog_cnt; j++)
if (env->subprog_info[j].start >= off + cnt)
break;
/* if j doesn't start exactly at off + cnt, we are just removing
* the front of previous prog
*/
if (env->subprog_info[j].start != off + cnt)
j--;
if (j > i) {
struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = env->prog->aux;
int move;
/* move fake 'exit' subprog as well */
move = env->subprog_cnt + 1 - j;
memmove(env->subprog_info + i,
env->subprog_info + j,
sizeof(*env->subprog_info) * move);
env->subprog_cnt -= j - i;
/* remove func_info */
if (aux->func_info) {
move = aux->func_info_cnt - j;
memmove(aux->func_info + i,
aux->func_info + j,
sizeof(*aux->func_info) * move);
aux->func_info_cnt -= j - i;
/* func_info->insn_off is set after all code rewrites,
* in adjust_btf_func() - no need to adjust
*/
}
} else {
/* convert i from "first prog to remove" to "first to adjust" */
if (env->subprog_info[i].start == off)
i++;
}
/* update fake 'exit' subprog as well */
for (; i <= env->subprog_cnt; i++)
env->subprog_info[i].start -= cnt;
return 0;
}
static int bpf_adj_linfo_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off,
u32 cnt)
{
struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
u32 i, l_off, l_cnt, nr_linfo;
struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
if (!nr_linfo)
return 0;
linfo = prog->aux->linfo;
/* find first line info to remove, count lines to be removed */
for (i = 0; i < nr_linfo; i++)
if (linfo[i].insn_off >= off)
break;
l_off = i;
l_cnt = 0;
for (; i < nr_linfo; i++)
if (linfo[i].insn_off < off + cnt)
l_cnt++;
else
break;
/* First live insn doesn't match first live linfo, it needs to "inherit"
* last removed linfo. prog is already modified, so prog->len == off
* means no live instructions after (tail of the program was removed).
*/
if (prog->len != off && l_cnt &&
(i == nr_linfo || linfo[i].insn_off != off + cnt)) {
l_cnt--;
linfo[--i].insn_off = off + cnt;
}
/* remove the line info which refer to the removed instructions */
if (l_cnt) {
memmove(linfo + l_off, linfo + i,
sizeof(*linfo) * (nr_linfo - i));
prog->aux->nr_linfo -= l_cnt;
nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
}
/* pull all linfo[i].insn_off >= off + cnt in by cnt */
for (i = l_off; i < nr_linfo; i++)
linfo[i].insn_off -= cnt;
/* fix up all subprogs (incl. 'exit') which start >= off */
for (i = 0; i <= env->subprog_cnt; i++)
if (env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx > l_off) {
/* program may have started in the removed region but
* may not be fully removed
*/
if (env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx >= l_off + l_cnt)
env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx -= l_cnt;
else
env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx = l_off;
}
return 0;
}
static int verifier_remove_insns(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 cnt)
{
struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data;
unsigned int orig_prog_len = env->prog->len;
int err;
err = bpf_remove_insns(env->prog, off, cnt);
if (err)
return err;
err = adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(env, off, cnt);
if (err)
return err;
err = bpf_adj_linfo_after_remove(env, off, cnt);
if (err)
return err;
memmove(aux_data + off, aux_data + off + cnt,
sizeof(*aux_data) * (orig_prog_len - off - cnt));
return 0;
}
/* The verifier does more data flow analysis than llvm and will not /* The verifier does more data flow analysis than llvm and will not
* explore branches that are dead at run time. Malicious programs can * explore branches that are dead at run time. Malicious programs can
* have dead code too. Therefore replace all dead at-run-time code * have dead code too. Therefore replace all dead at-run-time code
...@@ -6492,6 +6636,30 @@ static void opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) ...@@ -6492,6 +6636,30 @@ static void opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
} }
} }
static int opt_remove_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data;
int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
int i, err;
for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) {
int j;
j = 0;
while (i + j < insn_cnt && !aux_data[i + j].seen)
j++;
if (!j)
continue;
err = verifier_remove_insns(env, i, j);
if (err)
return err;
insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
}
return 0;
}
/* convert load instructions that access fields of a context type into a /* convert load instructions that access fields of a context type into a
* sequence of instructions that access fields of the underlying structure: * sequence of instructions that access fields of the underlying structure:
* struct __sk_buff -> struct sk_buff * struct __sk_buff -> struct sk_buff
...@@ -7282,11 +7450,13 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, ...@@ -7282,11 +7450,13 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
if (is_priv) { if (is_priv) {
if (ret == 0) if (ret == 0)
opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(env); opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(env);
if (ret == 0)
ret = opt_remove_dead_code(env);
} else {
if (ret == 0)
sanitize_dead_code(env);
} }
if (ret == 0)
sanitize_dead_code(env);
if (ret == 0) if (ret == 0)
/* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */ /* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */
ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env); ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment