Commit 54cab6af authored by Omar Sandoval's avatar Omar Sandoval Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: send: explicitly number commands and attributes

Commit e77fbf99 ("btrfs: send: prepare for v2 protocol") added
_BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V* macros equal to the maximum command number for the
version plus 1, but as written this creates gaps in the number space.

The maximum command number is currently 22, and __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V1 is
accordingly 23. But then __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V2 is 24, suggesting that v2
has a command numbered 23, and __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX is 25, suggesting that
23 and 24 are valid commands.

Instead, let's explicitly number all of the commands, attributes, and
sentinel MAX constants.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent ca182acc
......@@ -333,8 +333,8 @@ __maybe_unused
static bool proto_cmd_ok(const struct send_ctx *sctx, int cmd)
{
switch (sctx->proto) {
case 1: return cmd < __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V1;
case 2: return cmd < __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V2;
case 1: return cmd <= BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V1;
case 2: return cmd <= BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V2;
default: return false;
}
}
......
......@@ -46,84 +46,82 @@ struct btrfs_tlv_header {
/* commands */
enum btrfs_send_cmd {
BTRFS_SEND_C_UNSPEC,
BTRFS_SEND_C_UNSPEC = 0,
/* Version 1 */
BTRFS_SEND_C_SUBVOL,
BTRFS_SEND_C_SNAPSHOT,
BTRFS_SEND_C_SUBVOL = 1,
BTRFS_SEND_C_SNAPSHOT = 2,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKFILE,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKDIR,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKNOD,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKFIFO,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKSOCK,
BTRFS_SEND_C_SYMLINK,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKFILE = 3,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKDIR = 4,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKNOD = 5,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKFIFO = 6,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MKSOCK = 7,
BTRFS_SEND_C_SYMLINK = 8,
BTRFS_SEND_C_RENAME,
BTRFS_SEND_C_LINK,
BTRFS_SEND_C_UNLINK,
BTRFS_SEND_C_RMDIR,
BTRFS_SEND_C_RENAME = 9,
BTRFS_SEND_C_LINK = 10,
BTRFS_SEND_C_UNLINK = 11,
BTRFS_SEND_C_RMDIR = 12,
BTRFS_SEND_C_SET_XATTR,
BTRFS_SEND_C_REMOVE_XATTR,
BTRFS_SEND_C_SET_XATTR = 13,
BTRFS_SEND_C_REMOVE_XATTR = 14,
BTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE,
BTRFS_SEND_C_CLONE,
BTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE = 15,
BTRFS_SEND_C_CLONE = 16,
BTRFS_SEND_C_TRUNCATE,
BTRFS_SEND_C_CHMOD,
BTRFS_SEND_C_CHOWN,
BTRFS_SEND_C_UTIMES,
BTRFS_SEND_C_TRUNCATE = 17,
BTRFS_SEND_C_CHMOD = 18,
BTRFS_SEND_C_CHOWN = 19,
BTRFS_SEND_C_UTIMES = 20,
BTRFS_SEND_C_END,
BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT,
__BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V1,
BTRFS_SEND_C_END = 21,
BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT = 22,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V1 = 22,
/* Version 2 */
__BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V2,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX_V2 = 22,
/* End */
__BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX,
BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX = 22,
};
#define BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX (__BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX - 1)
/* attributes in send stream */
enum {
BTRFS_SEND_A_UNSPEC,
BTRFS_SEND_A_UUID,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CTRANSID,
BTRFS_SEND_A_INO,
BTRFS_SEND_A_SIZE,
BTRFS_SEND_A_MODE,
BTRFS_SEND_A_UID,
BTRFS_SEND_A_GID,
BTRFS_SEND_A_RDEV,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CTIME,
BTRFS_SEND_A_MTIME,
BTRFS_SEND_A_ATIME,
BTRFS_SEND_A_OTIME,
BTRFS_SEND_A_XATTR_NAME,
BTRFS_SEND_A_XATTR_DATA,
BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH,
BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH_TO,
BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH_LINK,
BTRFS_SEND_A_FILE_OFFSET,
BTRFS_SEND_A_DATA,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_UUID,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_CTRANSID,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_PATH,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_OFFSET,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_LEN,
__BTRFS_SEND_A_MAX,
BTRFS_SEND_A_UNSPEC = 0,
BTRFS_SEND_A_UUID = 1,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CTRANSID = 2,
BTRFS_SEND_A_INO = 3,
BTRFS_SEND_A_SIZE = 4,
BTRFS_SEND_A_MODE = 5,
BTRFS_SEND_A_UID = 6,
BTRFS_SEND_A_GID = 7,
BTRFS_SEND_A_RDEV = 8,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CTIME = 9,
BTRFS_SEND_A_MTIME = 10,
BTRFS_SEND_A_ATIME = 11,
BTRFS_SEND_A_OTIME = 12,
BTRFS_SEND_A_XATTR_NAME = 13,
BTRFS_SEND_A_XATTR_DATA = 14,
BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH = 15,
BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH_TO = 16,
BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH_LINK = 17,
BTRFS_SEND_A_FILE_OFFSET = 18,
BTRFS_SEND_A_DATA = 19,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_UUID = 20,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_CTRANSID = 21,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_PATH = 22,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_OFFSET = 23,
BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_LEN = 24,
BTRFS_SEND_A_MAX = 24,
};
#define BTRFS_SEND_A_MAX (__BTRFS_SEND_A_MAX - 1)
#ifdef __KERNEL__
long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args *arg);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment