Commit 5565461e authored by Chad Dupuis's avatar Chad Dupuis Committed by Christoph Hellwig

bnx2fc: fix incorrect DMA memory mapping in bnx2fc_unmap_sg_list()

This patch is based on a problem and solution from Maurizio Lombardi
where bnx2fc isn't consistent in which device struct we using for DMA
map and unmap operations.  Make them consistent by using dma_sg_unmap
in bnx2fc_unmap_sg_list like bnx2fc_map_sg.
Reviewed-by: default avatarEddie Wai <eddie.wai@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
parent fd10ccfa
......@@ -1654,6 +1654,10 @@ static int bnx2fc_map_sg(struct bnx2fc_cmd *io_req)
u64 addr;
int i;
/*
* Use dma_map_sg directly to ensure we're using the correct
* dev struct off of pcidev.
*/
sg_count = dma_map_sg(&hba->pcidev->dev, scsi_sglist(sc),
scsi_sg_count(sc), sc->sc_data_direction);
scsi_for_each_sg(sc, sg, sg_count, i) {
......@@ -1703,9 +1707,16 @@ static int bnx2fc_build_bd_list_from_sg(struct bnx2fc_cmd *io_req)
static void bnx2fc_unmap_sg_list(struct bnx2fc_cmd *io_req)
{
struct scsi_cmnd *sc = io_req->sc_cmd;
struct bnx2fc_interface *interface = io_req->port->priv;
struct bnx2fc_hba *hba = interface->hba;
if (io_req->bd_tbl->bd_valid && sc) {
scsi_dma_unmap(sc);
/*
* Use dma_unmap_sg directly to ensure we're using the correct
* dev struct off of pcidev.
*/
if (io_req->bd_tbl->bd_valid && sc && scsi_sg_count(sc)) {
dma_unmap_sg(&hba->pcidev->dev, scsi_sglist(sc),
scsi_sg_count(sc), sc->sc_data_direction);
io_req->bd_tbl->bd_valid = 0;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment