Commit 56696c1c authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König

pwm: samsung: Simplify code to determine the pwmchip's parent device

There is already a pointer to the pwmchip, make use of it directly
instead of using the struct samsung_pwm_chip *our_chip just obtained
from it. This also has the advantage of not using struct
samsung_pwm_chip::chip any more which will be dropped soon.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4e8400a42979b6be0b80dff5ae964d8e9d6232eb.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
parent a629a77e
......@@ -326,12 +326,12 @@ static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
period = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev, "duty_ns=%d, period_ns=%d (%u)\n",
dev_dbg(chip->dev, "duty_ns=%d, period_ns=%d (%u)\n",
duty_ns, period_ns, period);
tin_rate = pwm_samsung_calc_tin(our_chip, pwm->hwpwm, period);
dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev, "tin_rate=%lu\n", tin_rate);
dev_dbg(chip->dev, "tin_rate=%lu\n", tin_rate);
tin_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / tin_rate;
tcnt = period_ns / tin_ns;
......@@ -355,8 +355,7 @@ static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
/* -1UL will give 100% duty. */
--tcmp;
dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev,
"tin_ns=%u, tcmp=%u/%u\n", tin_ns, tcmp, tcnt);
dev_dbg(chip->dev, "tin_ns=%u, tcmp=%u/%u\n", tin_ns, tcmp, tcnt);
/* Update PWM registers. */
writel(tcnt, our_chip->base + REG_TCNTB(pwm->hwpwm));
......@@ -368,7 +367,7 @@ static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* shortly afer this update (before it autoreloaded the new values).
*/
if (oldtcmp == (u32) -1) {
dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev, "Forcing manual update");
dev_dbg(chip->dev, "Forcing manual update");
pwm_samsung_manual_update(our_chip, pwm);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment