Commit 56822db1 authored by Nirmoy Das's avatar Nirmoy Das Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/scheduler: improve job distribution with multiple queues

This patch uses score based logic to select a new rq for better
loadbalance between multiple rq/scheds instead of num_jobs.

Below are test results after running amdgpu_test from mesa drm

Before this patch:

sched_name     num of many times it got scheduled
=========      ==================================
sdma0          314
sdma1          32
comp_1.0.0     56
comp_1.0.1     0
comp_1.1.0     0
comp_1.1.1     0
comp_1.2.0     0
comp_1.2.1     0
comp_1.3.0     0
comp_1.3.1     0
After this patch:

sched_name     num of many times it got scheduled
=========      ==================================
sdma0          216
sdma1          185
comp_1.0.0     39
comp_1.0.1     9
comp_1.1.0     12
comp_1.1.1     0
comp_1.2.0     12
comp_1.2.1     0
comp_1.3.0     12
comp_1.3.1     0
Signed-off-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent 0c0dab86
...@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static struct drm_sched_rq * ...@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static struct drm_sched_rq *
drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
{ {
struct drm_sched_rq *rq = NULL; struct drm_sched_rq *rq = NULL;
unsigned int min_jobs = UINT_MAX, num_jobs; unsigned int min_score = UINT_MAX, num_score;
int i; int i;
for (i = 0; i < entity->num_sched_list; ++i) { for (i = 0; i < entity->num_sched_list; ++i) {
...@@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) ...@@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
continue; continue;
} }
num_jobs = atomic_read(&sched->num_jobs); num_score = atomic_read(&sched->score);
if (num_jobs < min_jobs) { if (num_score < min_score) {
min_jobs = num_jobs; min_score = num_score;
rq = &entity->sched_list[i]->sched_rq[entity->priority]; rq = &entity->sched_list[i]->sched_rq[entity->priority];
} }
} }
...@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job, ...@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job,
bool first; bool first;
trace_drm_sched_job(sched_job, entity); trace_drm_sched_job(sched_job, entity);
atomic_inc(&entity->rq->sched->num_jobs); atomic_inc(&entity->rq->sched->score);
WRITE_ONCE(entity->last_user, current->group_leader); WRITE_ONCE(entity->last_user, current->group_leader);
first = spsc_queue_push(&entity->job_queue, &sched_job->queue_node); first = spsc_queue_push(&entity->job_queue, &sched_job->queue_node);
......
...@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, ...@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
if (!list_empty(&entity->list)) if (!list_empty(&entity->list))
return; return;
spin_lock(&rq->lock); spin_lock(&rq->lock);
atomic_inc(&rq->sched->score);
list_add_tail(&entity->list, &rq->entities); list_add_tail(&entity->list, &rq->entities);
spin_unlock(&rq->lock); spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
} }
...@@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, ...@@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
if (list_empty(&entity->list)) if (list_empty(&entity->list))
return; return;
spin_lock(&rq->lock); spin_lock(&rq->lock);
atomic_dec(&rq->sched->score);
list_del_init(&entity->list); list_del_init(&entity->list);
if (rq->current_entity == entity) if (rq->current_entity == entity)
rq->current_entity = NULL; rq->current_entity = NULL;
...@@ -655,7 +657,7 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb) ...@@ -655,7 +657,7 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_fence->sched; struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_fence->sched;
atomic_dec(&sched->hw_rq_count); atomic_dec(&sched->hw_rq_count);
atomic_dec(&sched->num_jobs); atomic_dec(&sched->score);
trace_drm_sched_process_job(s_fence); trace_drm_sched_process_job(s_fence);
...@@ -830,7 +832,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, ...@@ -830,7 +832,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list_lock); spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list_lock);
atomic_set(&sched->hw_rq_count, 0); atomic_set(&sched->hw_rq_count, 0);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sched->work_tdr, drm_sched_job_timedout); INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sched->work_tdr, drm_sched_job_timedout);
atomic_set(&sched->num_jobs, 0); atomic_set(&sched->score, 0);
atomic64_set(&sched->job_id_count, 0); atomic64_set(&sched->job_id_count, 0);
/* Each scheduler will run on a seperate kernel thread */ /* Each scheduler will run on a seperate kernel thread */
......
...@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops { ...@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
* @job_list_lock: lock to protect the ring_mirror_list. * @job_list_lock: lock to protect the ring_mirror_list.
* @hang_limit: once the hangs by a job crosses this limit then it is marked * @hang_limit: once the hangs by a job crosses this limit then it is marked
* guilty and it will be considered for scheduling further. * guilty and it will be considered for scheduling further.
* @num_jobs: the number of jobs in queue in the scheduler * @score: score to help loadbalancer pick a idle sched
* @ready: marks if the underlying HW is ready to work * @ready: marks if the underlying HW is ready to work
* @free_guilty: A hit to time out handler to free the guilty job. * @free_guilty: A hit to time out handler to free the guilty job.
* *
...@@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ struct drm_gpu_scheduler { ...@@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ struct drm_gpu_scheduler {
struct list_head ring_mirror_list; struct list_head ring_mirror_list;
spinlock_t job_list_lock; spinlock_t job_list_lock;
int hang_limit; int hang_limit;
atomic_t num_jobs; atomic_t score;
bool ready; bool ready;
bool free_guilty; bool free_guilty;
}; };
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment