Commit 5689d49b authored by Yonghong Song's avatar Yonghong Song Committed by Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Track spill/fill of bounded scalars.

Under register pressure the llvm may spill registers with bounds into the stack.
The verifier has to track them through spill/fill otherwise many kinds of bound
errors will be seen. The spill/fill of induction variables was already
happening. This patch extends this logic from tracking spill/fill of a constant
into any bounded register. There is no need to track spill/fill of unbounded,
since no new information will be retrieved from the stack during register fill.

Though extra stack difference could cause state pruning to be less effective, no
adverse affects were seen from this patch on selftests and on cilium programs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
parent 75748837
...@@ -2227,6 +2227,20 @@ static bool register_is_const(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) ...@@ -2227,6 +2227,20 @@ static bool register_is_const(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_is_const(reg->var_off); return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_is_const(reg->var_off);
} }
static bool __is_scalar_unbounded(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
return tnum_is_unknown(reg->var_off) &&
reg->smin_value == S64_MIN && reg->smax_value == S64_MAX &&
reg->umin_value == 0 && reg->umax_value == U64_MAX &&
reg->s32_min_value == S32_MIN && reg->s32_max_value == S32_MAX &&
reg->u32_min_value == 0 && reg->u32_max_value == U32_MAX;
}
static bool register_is_bounded(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && !__is_scalar_unbounded(reg);
}
static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks,
const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{ {
...@@ -2278,7 +2292,7 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, ...@@ -2278,7 +2292,7 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
if (value_regno >= 0) if (value_regno >= 0)
reg = &cur->regs[value_regno]; reg = &cur->regs[value_regno];
if (reg && size == BPF_REG_SIZE && register_is_const(reg) && if (reg && size == BPF_REG_SIZE && register_is_bounded(reg) &&
!register_is_null(reg) && env->bpf_capable) { !register_is_null(reg) && env->bpf_capable) {
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_FP) { if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_FP) {
/* The backtracking logic can only recognize explicit /* The backtracking logic can only recognize explicit
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment