Commit 580efaa7 authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Catalin Marinas

arm64: smp: prepare for smp_processor_id() rework

Subsequent patches will make smp_processor_id() use a percpu variable.
This will make smp_processor_id() dependent on the percpu offset, and
thus we cannot use smp_processor_id() to figure out what to initialise
the offset to.

Prepare for this by initialising the percpu offset based on
current::cpu, which will work regardless of how smp_processor_id() is
implemented. Also, make this relationship obvious by placing this code
together at the start of secondary_start_kernel().
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: default avatarLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
parent 623b476f
......@@ -208,7 +208,10 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = &init_mm;
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
unsigned int cpu;
cpu = task_cpu(current);
set_my_cpu_offset(per_cpu_offset(cpu));
/*
* All kernel threads share the same mm context; grab a
......@@ -217,8 +220,6 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
current->active_mm = mm;
set_my_cpu_offset(per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id()));
/*
* TTBR0 is only used for the identity mapping at this stage. Make it
* point to zero page to avoid speculatively fetching new entries.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment