Commit 58829e49 authored by David Chinner's avatar David Chinner Committed by Nathan Scott

[XFS] Fix an inode use-after-free durin an unpin. When reclaiming inodes

that have been unlinked, we may need to execute transactions during
reclaim. By the time the transaction has hit the disk, the linux inode and
xfs vnode may already have been freed so we can't reference them safely.
Use the known xfs inode state to determine if it is safe to reference the
vnode and linux inode during the unpin operation.

SGI-PV: 946321
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25687a
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
parent 1fc5d959
......@@ -2732,16 +2732,29 @@ xfs_iunpin(
ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) > 0);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ip->i_pincount)) {
vnode_t *vp = XFS_ITOV_NULL(ip);
/*
* If the inode is currently being reclaimed, the
* linux inode _and_ the xfs vnode may have been
* freed so we cannot reference either of them safely.
* Hence we should not try to do anything to them
* if the xfs inode is currently in the reclaim
* path.
*
* However, we still need to issue the unpin wakeup
* call as the inode reclaim may be blocked waiting for
* the inode to become unpinned.
*/
if (!(ip->i_flags & (XFS_IRECLAIM|XFS_IRECLAIMABLE))) {
vnode_t *vp = XFS_ITOV_NULL(ip);
/* make sync come back and flush this inode */
if (vp) {
struct inode *inode = vn_to_inode(vp);
/* make sync come back and flush this inode */
if (vp) {
struct inode *inode = vn_to_inode(vp);
if (!(inode->i_state & I_NEW))
mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
if (!(inode->i_state & I_NEW))
mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
}
}
wake_up(&ip->i_ipin_wait);
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment