Commit 588cd7ef authored by Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi's avatar Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Committed by Andrii Nakryiko

bpf: Silence Coverity warning for find_kfunc_desc_btf

The helper function returns a pointer that in the failure case encodes
an error in the struct btf pointer. The current code lead to Coverity
warning about the use of the invalid pointer:

 *** CID 1507963:  Memory - illegal accesses  (USE_AFTER_FREE)
 /kernel/bpf/verifier.c: 1788 in find_kfunc_desc_btf()
 1782                          return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 1783                  }
 1784
 1785                  kfunc_btf = __find_kfunc_desc_btf(env, offset, btf_modp);
 1786                  if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(kfunc_btf)) {
 1787                          verbose(env, "cannot find module BTF for func_id %u\n", func_id);
 >>>      CID 1507963:  Memory - illegal accesses  (USE_AFTER_FREE)
 >>>      Using freed pointer "kfunc_btf".
 1788                          return kfunc_btf ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 1789                  }
 1790                  return kfunc_btf;
 1791          }
 1792          return btf_vmlinux ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 1793     }

Daniel suggested the use of ERR_CAST so that the intended use is clear
to Coverity, but on closer look it seems that we never return NULL from
the helper. Andrii noted that since __find_kfunc_desc_btf already logs
errors for all cases except btf_get_by_fd, it is much easier to add
logging for that and remove the IS_ERR check altogether, returning
directly from it.
Suggested-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211009040900.803436-1-memxor@gmail.com
parent 32fa0efa
...@@ -1727,8 +1727,10 @@ static struct btf *__find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, ...@@ -1727,8 +1727,10 @@ static struct btf *__find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT); return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
btf = btf_get_by_fd(btf_fd); btf = btf_get_by_fd(btf_fd);
if (IS_ERR(btf)) if (IS_ERR(btf)) {
verbose(env, "invalid module BTF fd specified\n");
return btf; return btf;
}
if (!btf_is_module(btf)) { if (!btf_is_module(btf)) {
verbose(env, "BTF fd for kfunc is not a module BTF\n"); verbose(env, "BTF fd for kfunc is not a module BTF\n");
...@@ -1771,8 +1773,6 @@ static struct btf *find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, ...@@ -1771,8 +1773,6 @@ static struct btf *find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
u32 func_id, s16 offset, u32 func_id, s16 offset,
struct module **btf_modp) struct module **btf_modp)
{ {
struct btf *kfunc_btf;
if (offset) { if (offset) {
if (offset < 0) { if (offset < 0) {
/* In the future, this can be allowed to increase limit /* In the future, this can be allowed to increase limit
...@@ -1782,12 +1782,7 @@ static struct btf *find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, ...@@ -1782,12 +1782,7 @@ static struct btf *find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
} }
kfunc_btf = __find_kfunc_desc_btf(env, offset, btf_modp); return __find_kfunc_desc_btf(env, offset, btf_modp);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(kfunc_btf)) {
verbose(env, "cannot find module BTF for func_id %u\n", func_id);
return kfunc_btf ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
}
return kfunc_btf;
} }
return btf_vmlinux ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); return btf_vmlinux ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment