Commit 58d86a50 authored by Wang Shilong's avatar Wang Shilong Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: update comments regarding ext4_delete_inode()

ext4_delete_inode() has been renamed for a long time, update
comments for this.
Signed-off-by: default avatarWang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parent 4fdb5543
...@@ -3620,7 +3620,7 @@ void ext4_truncate(struct inode *inode) ...@@ -3620,7 +3620,7 @@ void ext4_truncate(struct inode *inode)
* If this was a simple ftruncate() and the file will remain alive, * If this was a simple ftruncate() and the file will remain alive,
* then we need to clear up the orphan record which we created above. * then we need to clear up the orphan record which we created above.
* However, if this was a real unlink then we were called by * However, if this was a real unlink then we were called by
* ext4_delete_inode(), and we allow that function to clean up the * ext4_evict_inode(), and we allow that function to clean up the
* orphan info for us. * orphan info for us.
*/ */
if (inode->i_nlink) if (inode->i_nlink)
......
...@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ int ext4_ext_migrate(struct inode *inode) ...@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ int ext4_ext_migrate(struct inode *inode)
/* /*
* set the i_blocks count to zero * set the i_blocks count to zero
* so that the ext4_delete_inode does the * so that the ext4_evict_inode() does the
* right job * right job
* *
* We don't need to take the i_lock because * We don't need to take the i_lock because
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment