Commit 5a684245 authored by Luca Coelho's avatar Luca Coelho

iwlwifi: mvm: fix the type we use in the PPAG table validity checks

The value we receive from ACPI is a long long unsigned integer but the
values should be treated as signed char.  When comparing the received
value with ACPI_PPAG_MIN_LB/HB, we were doing an unsigned comparison,
so the negative value would actually be treated as a very high number.

To solve this issue, assign the value to our table of s8's before
making the comparison, so the value is already converted when we do
so.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210135352.b0ec69f312bc.If77fd9c61a96aa7ef2ac96d935b7efd7df502399@changeidSigned-off-by: default avatarLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
parent f9a78edb
......@@ -965,16 +965,23 @@ static int iwl_mvm_get_ppag_table(struct iwl_mvm *mvm)
union acpi_object *ent;
ent = &wifi_pkg->package.elements[idx++];
if (ent->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ||
(j == 0 && ent->integer.value > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_LB) ||
(j == 0 && ent->integer.value < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_LB) ||
(j != 0 && ent->integer.value > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_HB) ||
(j != 0 && ent->integer.value < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_HB)) {
ppag_table.v1.enabled = cpu_to_le32(0);
if (ent->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;
}
gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] = ent->integer.value;
if ((j == 0 &&
(gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_LB ||
gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_LB)) ||
(j != 0 &&
(gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] > ACPI_PPAG_MAX_HB ||
gain[i * num_sub_bands + j] < ACPI_PPAG_MIN_HB))) {
ppag_table.v1.enabled = cpu_to_le32(0);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;
}
}
}
ret = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment