Commit 5b5ccbc2 authored by Sudeep Holla's avatar Sudeep Holla Committed by Thomas Gleixner

Revert "tick: Prefer a lower rating device only if it's CPU local device"

This reverts commit 1332a905.

The original issue was not because of incorrect checking of cpumask for
both new and old tick device. It was incorrectly analysed was due to the
misunderstanding of the comment and misinterpretation of the return value
from tick_check_preferred. The main issue is with the clockevent driver
that sets the cpumask to cpu_all_mask instead of cpu_possible_mask.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: default avatarKevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: default avatarMartin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531151136-18297-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com
parent 1e4b044d
...@@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev, ...@@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
*/ */
return !curdev || return !curdev ||
newdev->rating > curdev->rating || newdev->rating > curdev->rating ||
(!cpumask_equal(curdev->cpumask, newdev->cpumask) && !cpumask_equal(curdev->cpumask, newdev->cpumask);
!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()));
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment