Commit 5c9464e2 authored by Matt Roper's avatar Matt Roper

drm/xe: Don't refer to general LRC initialization as a "wa"

During engine LRC initialization a number of registers need to be
programmed as general setup.  This programming is not a "workaround" so
naming the RTP table as "lrc_was" is misleading; switch to the name
"lrc_setup" to more accurately describe what the table is actually for.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarGustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240524230444.1447797-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
parent 0aa25625
......@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ xe_hw_engine_setup_default_lrc_state(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
u32 blit_cctl_val = REG_FIELD_PREP(BLIT_CCTL_DST_MOCS_MASK, mocs_write_idx) |
REG_FIELD_PREP(BLIT_CCTL_SRC_MOCS_MASK, mocs_read_idx);
struct xe_rtp_process_ctx ctx = XE_RTP_PROCESS_CTX_INITIALIZER(hwe);
const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr lrc_was[] = {
const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr lrc_setup[] = {
/*
* Some blitter commands do not have a field for MOCS, those
* commands will use MOCS index pointed by BLIT_CCTL.
......@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ xe_hw_engine_setup_default_lrc_state(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
{}
};
xe_rtp_process_to_sr(&ctx, lrc_was, &hwe->reg_lrc);
xe_rtp_process_to_sr(&ctx, lrc_setup, &hwe->reg_lrc);
}
static void
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment