Commit 5d6751ea authored by Dan Carpenter's avatar Dan Carpenter Committed by Kalle Valo

ath6kl: add some bounds checking

The "ev->traffic_class" and "reply->ac" variables come from the network
and they're used as an offset into the wmi->stream_exist_for_ac[] array.
Those variables are u8 so they can be 0-255 but the stream_exist_for_ac[]
array only has WMM_NUM_AC (4) elements.  We need to add a couple bounds
checks to prevent array overflows.

I also modified one existing check from "if (traffic_class > 3) {" to
"if (traffic_class >= WMM_NUM_AC) {" just to make them all consistent.

Fixes: bdcd8170 (" Add ath6kl cleaned up driver")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
parent 83d9562b
......@@ -1176,6 +1176,10 @@ static int ath6kl_wmi_pstream_timeout_event_rx(struct wmi *wmi, u8 *datap,
return -EINVAL;
ev = (struct wmi_pstream_timeout_event *) datap;
if (ev->traffic_class >= WMM_NUM_AC) {
ath6kl_err("invalid traffic class: %d\n", ev->traffic_class);
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* When the pstream (fat pipe == AC) timesout, it means there were
......@@ -1516,6 +1520,10 @@ static int ath6kl_wmi_cac_event_rx(struct wmi *wmi, u8 *datap, int len,
return -EINVAL;
reply = (struct wmi_cac_event *) datap;
if (reply->ac >= WMM_NUM_AC) {
ath6kl_err("invalid AC: %d\n", reply->ac);
return -EINVAL;
}
if ((reply->cac_indication == CAC_INDICATION_ADMISSION_RESP) &&
(reply->status_code != IEEE80211_TSPEC_STATUS_ADMISS_ACCEPTED)) {
......@@ -2632,7 +2640,7 @@ int ath6kl_wmi_delete_pstream_cmd(struct wmi *wmi, u8 if_idx, u8 traffic_class,
u16 active_tsids = 0;
int ret;
if (traffic_class > 3) {
if (traffic_class >= WMM_NUM_AC) {
ath6kl_err("invalid traffic class: %d\n", traffic_class);
return -EINVAL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment