Commit 5debf021 authored by Namhyung Kim's avatar Namhyung Kim Committed by Peter Zijlstra

perf/x86/intel: Fix a warning on x86_pmu_stop() with large PEBS

The commit 3966c3fe ("x86/perf/amd: Remove need to check "running"
bit in NMI handler") introduced this.  It seems x86_pmu_stop can be
called recursively (like when it losts some samples) like below:

  x86_pmu_stop
    intel_pmu_disable_event  (x86_pmu_disable)
      intel_pmu_pebs_disable
        intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm  (x86_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer)
          x86_pmu_stop

While commit 35d1ce6b ("perf/x86/intel/ds: Fix x86_pmu_stop
warning for large PEBS") fixed it for the normal cases, there's
another path to call x86_pmu_stop() recursively when a PEBS error was
detected (like two or more counters overflowed at the same time).

Like in the Kan's previous fix, we can skip the interrupt accounting
for large PEBS, so check the iregs which is set for PMI only.

Fixes: 3966c3fe ("x86/perf/amd: Remove need to check "running" bit in NMI handler")
Reported-by: default avatarJohn Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201126110922.317681-1-namhyung@kernel.org
parent ebd19fc3
......@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
if (error[bit]) {
perf_log_lost_samples(event, error[bit]);
if (perf_event_account_interrupt(event))
if (iregs && perf_event_account_interrupt(event))
x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment