Commit 5e4c7632 authored by Bob Peterson's avatar Bob Peterson

gfs2: Issue revokes more intelligently

Before this patch, function gfs2_write_revokes would call
gfs2_ail1_empty, then traverse the sd_ail1_list looking for
transactions that had bds which were no longer queued to a glock.
And if it found some, it would try to issue revokes for them, up to
a predetermined maximum. There were two problems with how it did
this. First was the fact that gfs2_ail1_empty moves transactions
which have nothing remaining on the ail1 list from the sd_ail1_list
to the sd_ail2_list, thus making its traversal of sd_ail1_list
miss them completely, and therefore, never issue revokes for them.
Second was the fact that there were three traversals (or partial
traversals) of the sd_ail1_list, each of which took and then
released the sd_ail_lock lock: First inside gfs2_ail1_empty,
second to determine if there are any revokes to be issued, and
third to actually issue them. All this taking and releasing of the
sd_ail_lock meant other processes could modify the lists and the
conditions in which we're working.

This patch simplies the whole process by adding a new parameter
to function gfs2_ail1_empty, max_revokes. For normal calls, this
is passed in as 0, meaning we don't want to issue any revokes.
For function gfs2_write_revokes, we pass in the maximum number
of revokes we can, thus allowing gfs2_ail1_empty to add the
revokes where needed. This simplies the code, allows for a single
holding of the sd_ail_lock, and allows gfs2_ail1_empty to add
revokes for all the necessary bd items without missing any.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
parent 7d9f9249
......@@ -191,11 +191,13 @@ static void gfs2_ail1_start(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
/**
* gfs2_ail1_empty_one - Check whether or not a trans in the AIL has been synced
* @sdp: the filesystem
* @ai: the AIL entry
* @tr: the transaction
* @max_revokes: If nonzero, issue revokes for the bd items for written buffers
*
*/
static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr,
int *max_revokes)
{
struct gfs2_bufdata *bd, *s;
struct buffer_head *bh;
......@@ -220,6 +222,17 @@ static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
gfs2_io_error_bh(sdp, bh);
gfs2_withdraw_delayed(sdp);
}
/*
* If we have space for revokes and the bd is no longer on any
* buf list, we can just add a revoke for it immediately and
* avoid having to put it on the ail2 list, where it would need
* to be revoked later.
*/
if (*max_revokes && list_empty(&bd->bd_list)) {
gfs2_add_revoke(sdp, bd);
(*max_revokes)--;
continue;
}
list_move(&bd->bd_ail_st_list, &tr->tr_ail2_list);
}
}
......@@ -227,11 +240,12 @@ static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
/**
* gfs2_ail1_empty - Try to empty the ail1 lists
* @sdp: The superblock
* @max_revokes: If non-zero, add revokes where appropriate
*
* Tries to empty the ail1 lists, starting with the oldest first
*/
static int gfs2_ail1_empty(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
static int gfs2_ail1_empty(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int max_revokes)
{
struct gfs2_trans *tr, *s;
int oldest_tr = 1;
......@@ -239,7 +253,7 @@ static int gfs2_ail1_empty(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(tr, s, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
gfs2_ail1_empty_one(sdp, tr);
gfs2_ail1_empty_one(sdp, tr, &max_revokes);
if (list_empty(&tr->tr_ail1_list) && oldest_tr)
list_move(&tr->tr_list, &sdp->sd_ail2_list);
else
......@@ -627,27 +641,24 @@ void gfs2_glock_remove_revoke(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
}
}
/**
* gfs2_write_revokes - Add as many revokes to the system transaction as we can
* @sdp: The GFS2 superblock
*
* Our usual strategy is to defer writing revokes as much as we can in the hope
* that we'll eventually overwrite the journal, which will make those revokes
* go away. This changes when we flush the log: at that point, there will
* likely be some left-over space in the last revoke block of that transaction.
* We can fill that space with additional revokes for blocks that have already
* been written back. This will basically come at no cost now, and will save
* us from having to keep track of those blocks on the AIL2 list later.
*/
void gfs2_write_revokes(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
{
struct gfs2_trans *tr;
struct gfs2_bufdata *bd, *tmp;
int have_revokes = 0;
/* number of revokes we still have room for */
int max_revokes = (sdp->sd_sb.sb_bsize - sizeof(struct gfs2_log_descriptor)) / sizeof(u64);
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp);
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
list_for_each_entry(bd, &tr->tr_ail2_list, bd_ail_st_list) {
if (list_empty(&bd->bd_list)) {
have_revokes = 1;
goto done;
}
}
}
done:
spin_unlock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
if (have_revokes == 0)
return;
gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
while (sdp->sd_log_num_revoke > max_revokes)
max_revokes += (sdp->sd_sb.sb_bsize - sizeof(struct gfs2_meta_header)) / sizeof(u64);
max_revokes -= sdp->sd_log_num_revoke;
......@@ -658,20 +669,7 @@ void gfs2_write_revokes(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
if (!sdp->sd_log_blks_reserved)
atomic_dec(&sdp->sd_log_blks_free);
}
gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(bd, tmp, &tr->tr_ail2_list, bd_ail_st_list) {
if (max_revokes == 0)
goto out_of_blocks;
if (!list_empty(&bd->bd_list))
continue;
gfs2_add_revoke(sdp, bd);
max_revokes--;
}
}
out_of_blocks:
spin_unlock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, max_revokes);
gfs2_log_unlock(sdp);
if (!sdp->sd_log_num_revoke) {
......@@ -870,7 +868,7 @@ void gfs2_log_flush(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_glock *gl, u32 flags)
for (;;) {
gfs2_ail1_start(sdp);
gfs2_ail1_wait(sdp);
if (gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp))
if (gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, 0))
break;
}
if (gfs2_withdrawn(sdp))
......@@ -1040,7 +1038,7 @@ int gfs2_logd(void *data)
did_flush = false;
if (gfs2_jrnl_flush_reqd(sdp) || t == 0) {
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp);
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, 0);
gfs2_log_flush(sdp, NULL, GFS2_LOG_HEAD_FLUSH_NORMAL |
GFS2_LFC_LOGD_JFLUSH_REQD);
did_flush = true;
......@@ -1049,7 +1047,7 @@ int gfs2_logd(void *data)
if (gfs2_ail_flush_reqd(sdp)) {
gfs2_ail1_start(sdp);
gfs2_ail1_wait(sdp);
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp);
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, 0);
gfs2_log_flush(sdp, NULL, GFS2_LOG_HEAD_FLUSH_NORMAL |
GFS2_LFC_LOGD_AIL_FLUSH_REQD);
did_flush = true;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment