Commit 60f916de authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

perf_counter: x86: Set the period in the intel overflow handler

Commit 9e350de3 ("perf_counter: Accurate period data")
missed a spot, which caused all Intel-PMU samples to have a
period of 0.

This broke auto-freq sampling.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 6e7d6fdc
...@@ -1224,6 +1224,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -1224,6 +1224,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(counter)) if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(counter))
continue; continue;
data.period = counter->hw.last_period;
if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data)) if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data))
intel_pmu_disable_counter(&counter->hw, bit); intel_pmu_disable_counter(&counter->hw, bit);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment