Commit 60fc1370 authored by NeilBrown's avatar NeilBrown

md: don't give up looking for spares on first failure-to-add

Before performing a recovery we try to remove any spares that
might not be working, then add any that might have become relevant.

Currently we abort on the first spare that cannot be added.
This is a false optimisation.
It is conceivable that - depending on rules in the personality - a
subsequent spare might be accepted.
Also the loop does other things like count the available spares and
reset the 'recovery_offset' value.

If we abort early these might not happen properly.

So remove the early abort.

In particular if you have an array what is undergoing recovery and
which has extra spares, then the recovery may not restart after as
reboot as the could of 'spares' might end up as zero.
Reported-by: default avatarAnssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
parent 30d7a483
......@@ -7360,8 +7360,7 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev)
spares++;
md_new_event(mddev);
set_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS, &mddev->flags);
} else
break;
}
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment