Commit 61239230 authored by Ryusuke Konishi's avatar Ryusuke Konishi Committed by Linus Torvalds

nilfs2: support nanosecond timestamp

After a review of user's feedback for finding out other compatibility
issues, I found nilfs improperly initializes timestamps in inode;
CURRENT_TIME was used there instead of CURRENT_TIME_SEC even though nilfs
didn't have nanosecond timestamps on disk.  A few users gave us the report
that the tar program sometimes failed to expand symbolic links on nilfs,
and it turned out to be the cause.

Instead of applying the above displacement, I've decided to support
nanosecond timestamps on this occation.  Fortunetaly, a needless 64-bit
field was in the nilfs_inode struct, and I found it's available for this
purpose without impact for the users.

So, this will do the enhancement and resolve the tar problem.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent e339ad31
......@@ -226,7 +226,6 @@ static struct inode *alloc_gcinode(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, ino_t ino,
ii->i_flags = 0;
ii->i_state = 1 << NILFS_I_GCINODE;
ii->i_bh = NULL;
ii->i_dtime = 0;
nilfs_bmap_init_gc(ii->i_bmap);
return inode;
......
......@@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ struct inode *nilfs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, int mode)
/* ii->i_file_acl = 0; */
/* ii->i_dir_acl = 0; */
ii->i_dtime = 0;
ii->i_dir_start_lookup = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_FS_POSIX_ACL
ii->i_acl = NULL;
......@@ -390,11 +389,10 @@ int nilfs_read_inode_common(struct inode *inode,
inode->i_atime.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime);
inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = 0;
inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = 0;
ii->i_dtime = le64_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_dtime);
if (inode->i_nlink == 0 && (inode->i_mode == 0 || ii->i_dtime))
inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime_nsec);
inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime_nsec);
inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime_nsec);
if (inode->i_nlink == 0 && inode->i_mode == 0)
return -EINVAL; /* this inode is deleted */
inode->i_blocks = le64_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_blocks);
......@@ -505,9 +503,10 @@ void nilfs_write_inode_common(struct inode *inode,
raw_inode->i_size = cpu_to_le64(inode->i_size);
raw_inode->i_ctime = cpu_to_le64(inode->i_ctime.tv_sec);
raw_inode->i_mtime = cpu_to_le64(inode->i_mtime.tv_sec);
raw_inode->i_ctime_nsec = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec);
raw_inode->i_mtime_nsec = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec);
raw_inode->i_blocks = cpu_to_le64(inode->i_blocks);
raw_inode->i_dtime = cpu_to_le64(ii->i_dtime);
raw_inode->i_flags = cpu_to_le32(ii->i_flags);
raw_inode->i_generation = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_generation);
......
......@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ struct nilfs_inode_info {
struct nilfs_bmap *i_bmap;
union nilfs_bmap_union i_bmap_union;
__u64 i_xattr; /* sector_t ??? */
__u32 i_dtime;
__u32 i_dir_start_lookup;
__u64 i_cno; /* check point number for GC inode */
struct address_space i_btnode_cache;
......
......@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ nilfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent,
sb->s_op = &nilfs_sops;
sb->s_export_op = &nilfs_export_ops;
sb->s_root = NULL;
sb->s_time_gran = 1;
if (!nilfs_loaded(nilfs)) {
err = load_nilfs(nilfs, sbi);
......
......@@ -67,9 +67,10 @@
* struct nilfs_inode - structure of an inode on disk
* @i_blocks: blocks count
* @i_size: size in bytes
* @i_ctime: creation time
* @i_mtime: modification time
* @i_dtime: deletion time
* @i_ctime: creation time (seconds)
* @i_mtime: modification time (seconds)
* @i_ctime_nsec: creation time (nano seconds)
* @i_mtime_nsec: modification time (nano seconds)
* @i_uid: user id
* @i_gid: group id
* @i_mode: file mode
......@@ -85,7 +86,8 @@ struct nilfs_inode {
__le64 i_size;
__le64 i_ctime;
__le64 i_mtime;
__le64 i_dtime;
__le32 i_ctime_nsec;
__le32 i_mtime_nsec;
__le32 i_uid;
__le32 i_gid;
__le16 i_mode;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment