Commit 61c22c34 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

clockevents: remove WARN_ON which was used to gather information

The issue of the endless reprogramming loop due to a too small
min_delta_ns was fixed with the previous updates of the clock events
code, but we had no information about the spread of this problem. I
added a WARN_ON to get automated information via kerneloops.org and to
get some direct reports, which allowed me to analyse the affected
machines.

The WARN_ON has served its purpose and would be annoying for a release
kernel. Remove it and just keep the information about the increase of
the min_delta_ns value.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent 82a28c79
...@@ -43,19 +43,17 @@ int tick_dev_program_event(struct clock_event_device *dev, ktime_t expires, ...@@ -43,19 +43,17 @@ int tick_dev_program_event(struct clock_event_device *dev, ktime_t expires,
* and emit a warning. * and emit a warning.
*/ */
if (++i > 2) { if (++i > 2) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "CE: __tick_program_event of %s is " /* Increase the min. delta and try again */
"stuck %llx %llx\n", dev->name ? dev->name : "?",
now.tv64, expires.tv64);
printk(KERN_WARNING
"CE: increasing min_delta_ns %ld to %ld nsec\n",
dev->min_delta_ns, dev->min_delta_ns << 1);
WARN_ON(1);
/* Double the min. delta and try again */
if (!dev->min_delta_ns) if (!dev->min_delta_ns)
dev->min_delta_ns = 5000; dev->min_delta_ns = 5000;
else else
dev->min_delta_ns <<= 1; dev->min_delta_ns += dev->min_delta_ns >> 1;
printk(KERN_WARNING
"CE: %s increasing min_delta_ns to %lu nsec\n",
dev->name ? dev->name : "?",
dev->min_delta_ns << 1);
i = 0; i = 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment