Commit 645efa84 authored by Mikulas Patocka's avatar Mikulas Patocka Committed by Mike Snitzer

dm: add memory barrier before waitqueue_active

Block core changes to switch bio-based IO accounting to be percpu had a
side-effect of altering DM core to now rely on calling waitqueue_active
(in both bio-based and request-based) to check if another task is in
dm_wait_for_completion().

A memory barrier is needed before calling waitqueue_active().  DM core
doesn't piggyback on a preceding memory barrier so it must explicitly
use its own.

For more details on why using waitqueue_active() without a preceding
barrier is unsafe, please see the comment before the waitqueue_active()
definition in include/linux/wait.h.

Add the missing memory barrier by switching to using wq_has_sleeper().

Fixes: 6f757231 ("dm: remove the pending IO accounting")
Fixes: c4576aed ("dm: fix request-based dm's use of dm_wait_for_completion")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
parent 8834f560
......@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void rq_end_stats(struct mapped_device *md, struct request *orig)
static void rq_completed(struct mapped_device *md)
{
/* nudge anyone waiting on suspend queue */
if (unlikely(waitqueue_active(&md->wait)))
if (unlikely(wq_has_sleeper(&md->wait)))
wake_up(&md->wait);
/*
......
......@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void end_io_acct(struct dm_io *io)
true, duration, &io->stats_aux);
/* nudge anyone waiting on suspend queue */
if (unlikely(waitqueue_active(&md->wait)))
if (unlikely(wq_has_sleeper(&md->wait)))
wake_up(&md->wait);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment