Commit 65405bf4 authored by Kees Cook's avatar Kees Cook Committed by Willy Tarreau

exec/ptrace: fix get_dumpable() incorrect tests

commit d049f74f upstream

The get_dumpable() return value is not boolean.  Most users of the
function actually want to be testing for non-SUID_DUMP_USER(1) rather than
SUID_DUMP_DISABLE(0).  The SUID_DUMP_ROOT(2) is also considered a
protected state.  Almost all places did this correctly, excepting the two
places fixed in this patch.

Wrong logic:
    if (dumpable == SUID_DUMP_DISABLE) { /* be protective */ }
        or
    if (dumpable == 0) { /* be protective */ }
        or
    if (!dumpable) { /* be protective */ }

Correct logic:
    if (dumpable != SUID_DUMP_USER) { /* be protective */ }
        or
    if (dumpable != 1) { /* be protective */ }

Without this patch, if the system had set the sysctl fs/suid_dumpable=2, a
user was able to ptrace attach to processes that had dropped privileges to
that user.  (This may have been partially mitigated if Yama was enabled.)

The macros have been moved into the file that declares get/set_dumpable(),
which means things like the ia64 code can see them too.

CVE-2013-2929
Reported-by: default avatarVasily Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[dannf: backported to Debian's 2.6.32]
Signed-off-by: default avatarWilly Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
parent a14cc8a6
......@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ struct thread_struct {
regs->loadrs = 0; \
regs->r8 = get_dumpable(current->mm); /* set "don't zap registers" flag */ \
regs->r12 = new_sp - 16; /* allocate 16 byte scratch area */ \
if (unlikely(!get_dumpable(current->mm))) { \
if (unlikely(get_dumpable(current->mm) != SUID_DUMP_USER)) { \
/* \
* Zap scratch regs to avoid leaking bits between processes with different \
* uid/privileges. \
......
......@@ -1793,6 +1793,12 @@ void set_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm, int value)
}
}
/*
* This returns the actual value of the suid_dumpable flag. For things
* that are using this for checking for privilege transitions, it must
* test against SUID_DUMP_USER rather than treating it as a boolean
* value.
*/
int get_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
int ret;
......
......@@ -107,9 +107,6 @@ extern int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm);
extern void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm);
extern int suid_dumpable;
#define SUID_DUMP_DISABLE 0 /* No setuid dumping */
#define SUID_DUMP_USER 1 /* Dump as user of process */
#define SUID_DUMP_ROOT 2 /* Dump as root */
/* Stack area protections */
#define EXSTACK_DEFAULT 0 /* Whatever the arch defaults to */
......
......@@ -442,6 +442,10 @@ static inline unsigned long get_mm_hiwater_vm(struct mm_struct *mm)
extern void set_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm, int value);
extern int get_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm);
#define SUID_DUMP_DISABLE 0 /* No setuid dumping */
#define SUID_DUMP_USER 1 /* Dump as user of process */
#define SUID_DUMP_ROOT 2 /* Dump as root */
/* mm flags */
/* dumpable bits */
#define MMF_DUMPABLE 0 /* core dump is permitted */
......
......@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
smp_rmb();
if (task->mm)
dumpable = get_dumpable(task->mm);
if (!dumpable && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
if (dumpable != SUID_DUMP_USER && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
return -EPERM;
return security_ptrace_access_check(task, mode);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment