Commit 655eef10 authored by Alex Gartrell's avatar Alex Gartrell Committed by Simon Horman

ipvs: Supply destination addr family to ip_vs_{lookup_dest,find_dest}

We need to remove the assumption that virtual address family is the same as
real address family in order to support heterogeneous services (that is,
services with v4 vips and v6 backends or the opposite).
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSimon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
parent 6cff339b
......@@ -1399,8 +1399,9 @@ void ip_vs_unregister_nl_ioctl(void);
int ip_vs_control_init(void);
void ip_vs_control_cleanup(void);
struct ip_vs_dest *
ip_vs_find_dest(struct net *net, int af, const union nf_inet_addr *daddr,
__be16 dport, const union nf_inet_addr *vaddr, __be16 vport,
ip_vs_find_dest(struct net *net, int svc_af, int dest_af,
const union nf_inet_addr *daddr, __be16 dport,
const union nf_inet_addr *vaddr, __be16 vport,
__u16 protocol, __u32 fwmark, __u32 flags);
void ip_vs_try_bind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp);
......
......@@ -616,7 +616,13 @@ void ip_vs_try_bind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
struct ip_vs_dest *dest;
rcu_read_lock();
dest = ip_vs_find_dest(ip_vs_conn_net(cp), cp->af, &cp->daddr,
/* This function is only invoked by the synchronization code. We do
* not currently support heterogeneous pools with synchronization,
* so we can make the assumption that the svc_af is the same as the
* dest_af
*/
dest = ip_vs_find_dest(ip_vs_conn_net(cp), cp->af, cp->af, &cp->daddr,
cp->dport, &cp->vaddr, cp->vport,
cp->protocol, cp->fwmark, cp->flags);
if (dest) {
......
......@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ bool ip_vs_has_real_service(struct net *net, int af, __u16 protocol,
* Called under RCU lock.
*/
static struct ip_vs_dest *
ip_vs_lookup_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const union nf_inet_addr *daddr,
__be16 dport)
ip_vs_lookup_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, int dest_af,
const union nf_inet_addr *daddr, __be16 dport)
{
struct ip_vs_dest *dest;
......@@ -583,9 +583,9 @@ ip_vs_lookup_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const union nf_inet_addr *daddr,
* Find the destination for the given service
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu(dest, &svc->destinations, n_list) {
if ((dest->af == svc->af)
&& ip_vs_addr_equal(svc->af, &dest->addr, daddr)
&& (dest->port == dport)) {
if ((dest->af == dest_af) &&
ip_vs_addr_equal(dest_af, &dest->addr, daddr) &&
(dest->port == dport)) {
/* HIT */
return dest;
}
......@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ ip_vs_lookup_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const union nf_inet_addr *daddr,
* on the backup.
* Called under RCU lock, no refcnt is returned.
*/
struct ip_vs_dest *ip_vs_find_dest(struct net *net, int af,
struct ip_vs_dest *ip_vs_find_dest(struct net *net, int svc_af, int dest_af,
const union nf_inet_addr *daddr,
__be16 dport,
const union nf_inet_addr *vaddr,
......@@ -613,14 +613,14 @@ struct ip_vs_dest *ip_vs_find_dest(struct net *net, int af,
struct ip_vs_service *svc;
__be16 port = dport;
svc = ip_vs_service_find(net, af, fwmark, protocol, vaddr, vport);
svc = ip_vs_service_find(net, svc_af, fwmark, protocol, vaddr, vport);
if (!svc)
return NULL;
if (fwmark && (flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_FWD_MASK) != IP_VS_CONN_F_MASQ)
port = 0;
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, daddr, port);
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, dest_af, daddr, port);
if (!dest)
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, daddr, port ^ dport);
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, dest_af, daddr, port ^ dport);
return dest;
}
......@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ ip_vs_add_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)
/* We use function that requires RCU lock */
rcu_read_lock();
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, &daddr, dport);
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, udest->af, &daddr, dport);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (dest != NULL) {
......@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ ip_vs_edit_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)
/* We use function that requires RCU lock */
rcu_read_lock();
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, &daddr, dport);
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, udest->af, &daddr, dport);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (dest == NULL) {
......@@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ ip_vs_del_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)
/* We use function that requires RCU lock */
rcu_read_lock();
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, &udest->addr, dport);
dest = ip_vs_lookup_dest(svc, udest->af, &udest->addr, dport);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (dest == NULL) {
......
......@@ -880,8 +880,14 @@ static void ip_vs_proc_conn(struct net *net, struct ip_vs_conn_param *param,
* but still handled.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
dest = ip_vs_find_dest(net, type, daddr, dport, param->vaddr,
param->vport, protocol, fwmark, flags);
/* This function is only invoked by the synchronization
* code. We do not currently support heterogeneous pools
* with synchronization, so we can make the assumption that
* the svc_af is the same as the dest_af
*/
dest = ip_vs_find_dest(net, type, type, daddr, dport,
param->vaddr, param->vport, protocol,
fwmark, flags);
cp = ip_vs_conn_new(param, daddr, dport, flags, dest, fwmark);
rcu_read_unlock();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment