Commit 657d910b authored by Kees Cook's avatar Kees Cook

LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization

This provides a place for ordered LSMs to be initialized, separate from
the "major" LSMs. This is mainly a copy/paste from major_lsm_init() to
ordered_lsm_init(), but it will change drastically in later patches.

What is not obvious in the patch is that this change moves the integrity
LSM from major_lsm_init() into ordered_lsm_init(), since it is not marked
with the LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR. As it is the only LSM in the "ordered"
list, there is no reordering yet created.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
parent 47008e51
......@@ -52,12 +52,30 @@ static __initdata bool debug;
pr_info(__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
{
struct lsm_info *lsm;
int ret;
for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) != 0)
continue;
init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->name);
ret = lsm->init();
WARN(ret, "%s failed to initialize: %d\n", lsm->name, ret);
}
}
static void __init major_lsm_init(void)
{
struct lsm_info *lsm;
int ret;
for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0)
continue;
init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->name);
ret = lsm->init();
WARN(ret, "%s failed to initialize: %d\n", lsm->name, ret);
......@@ -87,6 +105,9 @@ int __init security_init(void)
yama_add_hooks();
loadpin_add_hooks();
/* Load LSMs in specified order. */
ordered_lsm_init();
/*
* Load all the remaining security modules.
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment