Merge branch 'remove-page-frag-implementation-in-vhost_net'
Yunsheng Lin says: ==================== remove page frag implementation in vhost_net Currently there are three implementations for page frag: 1. mm/page_alloc.c: net stack seems to be using it in the rx part with 'struct page_frag_cache' and the main API being page_frag_alloc_align(). 2. net/core/sock.c: net stack seems to be using it in the tx part with 'struct page_frag' and the main API being skb_page_frag_refill(). 3. drivers/vhost/net.c: vhost seems to be using it to build xdp frame, and it's implementation seems to be a mix of the above two. This patchset tries to unfiy the page frag implementation a little bit by unifying gfp bit for order 3 page allocation and replacing page frag implementation in vhost.c with the one in page_alloc.c. After this patchset, we are not only able to unify the page frag implementation a little, but also able to have about 0.5% performance boost testing by using the vhost_net_test introduced in the last patch. Before this patchset: Performance counter stats for './vhost_net_test' (10 runs): 305325.78 msec task-clock # 1.738 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.12% ) 1048668 context-switches # 3.435 K/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 11 cpu-migrations # 0.036 /sec ( +- 17.64% ) 33 page-faults # 0.108 /sec ( +- 0.49% ) 244651819491 cycles # 0.801 GHz ( +- 0.43% ) (64) 64714638024 stalled-cycles-frontend # 26.45% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.19% ) (67) 30774313491 stalled-cycles-backend # 12.58% backend cycles idle ( +- 7.68% ) (70) 201749748680 instructions # 0.82 insn per cycle # 0.32 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.41% ) (66.76%) 65494787909 branches # 214.508 M/sec ( +- 0.35% ) (64) 4284111313 branch-misses # 6.54% of all branches ( +- 0.45% ) (66) 175.699 +- 0.189 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.11% ) After this patchset: Performance counter stats for './vhost_net_test' (10 runs): 303974.38 msec task-clock # 1.739 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.14% ) 1048807 context-switches # 3.450 K/sec ( +- 0.00% ) 14 cpu-migrations # 0.046 /sec ( +- 12.86% ) 33 page-faults # 0.109 /sec ( +- 0.46% ) 251289376347 cycles # 0.827 GHz ( +- 0.32% ) (60) 67885175415 stalled-cycles-frontend # 27.01% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.48% ) (63) 27809282600 stalled-cycles-backend # 11.07% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.36% ) (71) 195543234672 instructions # 0.78 insn per cycle # 0.35 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.29% ) (69.04%) 62423183552 branches # 205.357 M/sec ( +- 0.48% ) (67) 4135666632 branch-misses # 6.63% of all branches ( +- 0.63% ) (67) 174.764 +- 0.214 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.12% ) Changelog: V6: Add timeout for poll() and simplify some logic as suggested by Jason. V5: Address the comment from jason in vhost_net_test.c and the comment about leaving out the gfp change for page frag in sock.c as suggested by Paolo. V4: Resend based on latest net-next branch. V3: 1. Add __page_frag_alloc_align() which is passed with the align mask the original function expected as suggested by Alexander. 2. Drop patch 3 in v2 suggested by Alexander. 3. Reorder patch 4 & 5 in v2 suggested by Alexander. Note that placing this gfp flags handing for order 3 page in an inline function is not considered, as we may be able to unify the page_frag and page_frag_cache handling. V2: Change 'xor'd' to 'masked off', add vhost tx testing for vhost_net_test. V1: Fix some typo, drop RFC tag and rebase on latest net-next. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240228093013.8263-1-linyunsheng@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment