Commit 6731eb04 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: Properly write lock bw_state when it changes

The current code also forgets to call intel_atomic_lock_global_state()
when other stuff besides the final min_cdlck changes in the state.
That means we may throw away data which actually has changed, and
thus we can't be at all sure what the code ends up doing during
subsequent commits. Do the write lock properly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220303191207.27931-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
parent 6c69d0bb
......@@ -678,6 +678,28 @@ intel_atomic_get_bw_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state);
}
static bool intel_bw_state_changed(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state,
const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state)
{
enum pipe pipe;
for_each_pipe(i915, pipe) {
const struct intel_dbuf_bw *old_crtc_bw =
&old_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
const struct intel_dbuf_bw *new_crtc_bw =
&new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
enum dbuf_slice slice;
for_each_dbuf_slice(i915, slice) {
if (old_crtc_bw->used_bw[slice] != new_crtc_bw->used_bw[slice])
return true;
}
}
return old_bw_state->min_cdclk != new_bw_state->min_cdclk;
}
static void skl_crtc_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
......@@ -765,7 +787,7 @@ int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
new_bw_state->min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_bw, 64);
if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
if (intel_bw_state_changed(dev_priv, old_bw_state, new_bw_state)) {
int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
if (ret)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment