libceph: fix ceph_msg_revoke()
There are a number of problems with revoking a "was sending" message: (1) We never make any attempt to revoke data - only kvecs contibute to con->out_skip. However, once the header (envelope) is written to the socket, our peer learns data_len and sets itself to expect at least data_len bytes to follow front or front+middle. If ceph_msg_revoke() is called while the messenger is sending message's data portion, anything we send after that call is counted by the OSD towards the now revoked message's data portion. The effects vary, the most common one is the eventual hang - higher layers get stuck waiting for the reply to the message that was sent out after ceph_msg_revoke() returned and treated by the OSD as a bunch of data bytes. This is what Matt ran into. (2) Flat out zeroing con->out_kvec_bytes worth of bytes to handle kvecs is wrong. If ceph_msg_revoke() is called before the tag is sent out or while the messenger is sending the header, we will get a connection reset, either due to a bad tag (0 is not a valid tag) or a bad header CRC, which kind of defeats the purpose of revoke. Currently the kernel client refuses to work with header CRCs disabled, but that will likely change in the future, making this even worse. (3) con->out_skip is not reset on connection reset, leading to one or more spurious connection resets if we happen to get a real one between con->out_skip is set in ceph_msg_revoke() and before it's cleared in write_partial_skip(). Fixing (1) and (3) is trivial. The idea behind fixing (2) is to never zero the tag or the header, i.e. send out tag+header regardless of when ceph_msg_revoke() is called. That way the header is always correct, no unnecessary resets are induced and revoke stands ready for disabled CRCs. Since ceph_msg_revoke() rips out con->out_msg, introduce a new "message out temp" and copy the header into it before sending. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0+ Reported-by: Matt Conner <matt.conner@keepertech.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Tested-by: Matt Conner <matt.conner@keepertech.com> Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment