Commit 679b8fe4 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: governor: Fix nice contribution computation in dbs_check_cpu()

The contribution of the CPU nice time to the idle time in dbs_check_cpu()
is computed in a bogus way, as the code may subtract current and previous
nice values for different CPUs.

That doesn't matter for cases when cpufreq policies are not shared,
but may lead to problems otherwise.

Fix the computation and simplify it to avoid taking unnecessary steps.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
parent e4db2813
......@@ -198,22 +198,10 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = cur_idle_time;
if (ignore_nice) {
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
u64 cur_nice;
unsigned long cur_nice_jiffies;
u64 cur_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
cur_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] -
cdbs->prev_cpu_nice;
/*
* Assumption: nice time between sampling periods will
* be less than 2^32 jiffies for 32 bit sys
*/
cur_nice_jiffies = (unsigned long)
cputime64_to_jiffies64(cur_nice);
cdbs->prev_cpu_nice =
kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
idle_time += jiffies_to_usecs(cur_nice_jiffies);
idle_time += cputime_to_usecs(cur_nice - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice);
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = cur_nice;
}
if (unlikely(!wall_time || wall_time < idle_time))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment