staging: vchiq_arm: tidy up service function naming
During a recent review Dan Carpenter reported that the function naming of (un)lock_service is misleading. They are like wrapper around kref_get / kref_put and don't have anything to do with locking. So use a name which represent more the actual behavior. Btw add the vchiq prefix to avoid possible name conflicts. Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1622735405-9980-12-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment