Commit 6b359d55 authored by Alaa Hleihel's avatar Alaa Hleihel Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5: Check for SQ and not RQ state when modifying hairpin SQ

When modifying hairpin SQ, instead of checking if the next state equals
to MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY, we compare it against the MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY enum
value.

The code worked since both of MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY and MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY
have the same value today.

This patch fixes this issue.

Fixes: 18e568c3 ("net/mlx5: Hairpin pair core object setup")
Change-Id: I6758aa7b4bd137966ae28206b70648c5bc223b46
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
parent 250ae0d4
...@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int mlx5_hairpin_modify_sq(struct mlx5_core_dev *peer_mdev, u32 sqn, ...@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int mlx5_hairpin_modify_sq(struct mlx5_core_dev *peer_mdev, u32 sqn,
sqc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(modify_sq_in, in, ctx); sqc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(modify_sq_in, in, ctx);
if (next_state == MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY) { if (next_state == MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY) {
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_rq, peer_rq); MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_rq, peer_rq);
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_vhca, peer_vhca); MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_vhca, peer_vhca);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment