[PATCH] task_struct.exit_state usage
I just did a quick audit of the use of exit_state and the EXIT_* bit macros. I guess I didn't really review these changes very closely when you did them originally. :-( I found several places that seem like lossy cases of query-replace without enough thought about the code. Linus has previously said the >= tests ought to be & tests instead. But for exit_state, it can only ever be 0, EXIT_DEAD, or EXIT_ZOMBIE--so a nonzero test is actually the same as testing & (EXIT_DEAD|EXIT_ZOMBIE), and maybe its code is a tiny bit better. The case like in choose_new_parent is just confusing, to have the always-false test for EXIT_* bits in ->state there too. The two cases in wants_signal and do_process_times are actual regressions that will give us back old bugs in race conditions. These places had s/TASK/EXIT/ but not s/state/exit_state/, and now there tests for exiting tasks are now wrong and never catching them. I take it back: there is no regression in wants_signal in practice I think, because of the PF_EXITING test that makes the EXIT_* state checks superfluous anyway. So that is just another cosmetic case of confusing code. But in do_process_times, there is that SIGXCPU-while-exiting race condition back again. Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment