Commit 6c0544e2 authored by majianpeng's avatar majianpeng Committed by NeilBrown

md/raid5: Do not add data_offset before call to is_badblock

In chunk_aligned_read() we are adding data_offset before calling
is_badblock.  But is_badblock also adds data_offset, so that is bad.

So move the addition of data_offset to after the call to
is_badblock.

This bug was introduced by commit 31c176ec
     md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks.
which first appeared in 3.0.  So that patch is suitable for any
-stable kernel from 3.0.y onwards.  However it will need minor
revision for most of those (as the comment didn't appear until
recently).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarmajianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
parent 5cfb22a1
...@@ -3881,8 +3881,6 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio) ...@@ -3881,8 +3881,6 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio)
raid_bio->bi_next = (void*)rdev; raid_bio->bi_next = (void*)rdev;
align_bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev; align_bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
align_bi->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID); align_bi->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
/* No reshape active, so we can trust rdev->data_offset */
align_bi->bi_sector += rdev->data_offset;
if (!bio_fits_rdev(align_bi) || if (!bio_fits_rdev(align_bi) ||
is_badblock(rdev, align_bi->bi_sector, align_bi->bi_size>>9, is_badblock(rdev, align_bi->bi_sector, align_bi->bi_size>>9,
...@@ -3893,6 +3891,9 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio) ...@@ -3893,6 +3891,9 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio)
return 0; return 0;
} }
/* No reshape active, so we can trust rdev->data_offset */
align_bi->bi_sector += rdev->data_offset;
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock); spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_stripe, wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_stripe,
conf->quiesce == 0, conf->quiesce == 0,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment