Commit 6db35ad2 authored by Scott Wood's avatar Scott Wood

powerpc/mm: Use common paging_init() for NUMA

Commit 1c98025c "powerpc: Dynamic DMA
zone limits" updated how zones are created in paging_init(), but missed
the NUMA version of paging_init().  This was noticed via a linker
error, since dma_pfn_limit_to_zone() was, like the non-NUMA
paging_init(), limited by #ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES.

It turns out that the NUMA paging_init() was not actually doing
anything different from the standard paging_init(), other than a couple
debug prints, a couple 32-bit-only ifdef sections, and a call to
mark_nonram_nosave().  It's not clear whether mark_nonram_nosave() is
inherently wrong to do for NUMA, or just not useful on targets that
have NUMA, but for now I'm preserving the existing behavior.

Fixes: 1c98025c "powerpc: Dynamic DMA zone limits"
Reported-by: default avatarStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
parent 94105a76
......@@ -259,6 +259,12 @@ static int __init mark_nonram_nosave(void)
}
return 0;
}
#else /* CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES */
static int __init mark_nonram_nosave(void)
{
return 0;
}
#endif
static bool zone_limits_final;
......@@ -351,7 +357,6 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
mark_nonram_nosave();
}
#endif /* ! CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES */
static void __init register_page_bootmem_info(void)
{
......
......@@ -1126,14 +1126,6 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
(void *)(unsigned long)boot_cpuid);
}
void __init paging_init(void)
{
unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES];
memset(max_zone_pfns, 0, sizeof(max_zone_pfns));
max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = memblock_end_of_DRAM() >> PAGE_SHIFT;
free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
}
static int __init early_numa(char *p)
{
if (!p)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment