Commit 6dbdc9f3 authored by Hongyi Lu's avatar Hongyi Lu Committed by Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Fix spelling in bpf_verifier.h

Minor spelling fix spotted in bpf_verifier.h. Spelling is no big deal,
but it is still an improvement when reading through the code.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHongyi Lu <jwnhy0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220613211633.58647-1-jwnhy0@gmail.com
parent d5e9aeda
...@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state { ...@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state {
* If is_state_visited() sees a state with branches > 0 it means * If is_state_visited() sees a state with branches > 0 it means
* there is a loop. If such state is exactly equal to the current state * there is a loop. If such state is exactly equal to the current state
* it's an infinite loop. Note states_equal() checks for states * it's an infinite loop. Note states_equal() checks for states
* equvalency, so two states being 'states_equal' does not mean * equivalency, so two states being 'states_equal' does not mean
* infinite loop. The exact comparison is provided by * infinite loop. The exact comparison is provided by
* states_maybe_looping() function. It's a stronger pre-check and * states_maybe_looping() function. It's a stronger pre-check and
* much faster than states_equal(). * much faster than states_equal().
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment