Commit 6e1beb3c authored by Martin Schwidefsky's avatar Martin Schwidefsky

[S390] page_mkclean data corruption.

The git commit c2fda5fe which
added the page_test_and_clear_dirty call to page_mkclean and the
git commit 7658cc28 which fixes
the "nasty and subtle race in shared mmap'ed page writeback"
problem in clear_page_dirty_for_io cause data corruption on s390.

The effect of the two changes is that for every call to
clear_page_dirty_for_io a page_test_and_clear_dirty is done. If
the per page dirty bit is set set_page_dirty is called. Strangly
clear_page_dirty_for_io is called for not-uptodate pages, e.g.
over this call-chain:

 [<000000000007c0f2>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x12a/0x130
 [<000000000007c494>] generic_writepages+0x258/0x3e0
 [<000000000007c692>] do_writepages+0x76/0x7c
 [<00000000000c7a26>] __writeback_single_inode+0xba/0x3e4
 [<00000000000c831a>] sync_sb_inodes+0x23e/0x398
 [<00000000000c8802>] writeback_inodes+0x12e/0x140
 [<000000000007b9ee>] wb_kupdate+0xd2/0x178
 [<000000000007cca2>] pdflush+0x162/0x23c

The bad news now is that page_test_and_clear_dirty might claim
that a not-uptodate page is dirty since SetPageUptodate which
resets the per page dirty bit has not yet been called. The page
writeback that follows clobbers the data on disk.

The simplest solution to this problem is to move the call to
page_test_and_clear_dirty under the "if (page_mapped(page))".
If a file backed page is mapped it is uptodate.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent 348e3fd1
...@@ -498,9 +498,9 @@ int page_mkclean(struct page *page) ...@@ -498,9 +498,9 @@ int page_mkclean(struct page *page)
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page); struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
if (mapping) if (mapping)
ret = page_mkclean_file(mapping, page); ret = page_mkclean_file(mapping, page);
if (page_test_and_clear_dirty(page))
ret = 1;
} }
if (page_test_and_clear_dirty(page))
ret = 1;
return ret; return ret;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment