Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
L
linux
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
linux
Commits
6e6b1bd1
Commit
6e6b1bd1
authored
Aug 13, 2009
by
Al Viro
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Kill cached_lookup() and real_lookup()
Signed-off-by:
Al Viro
<
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
>
parent
2dd6d1f4
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
66 additions
and
87 deletions
+66
-87
fs/namei.c
fs/namei.c
+66
-87
No files found.
fs/namei.c
View file @
6e6b1bd1
...
...
@@ -411,26 +411,6 @@ do_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
return
dentry
;
}
/*
* Internal lookup() using the new generic dcache.
* SMP-safe
*/
static
struct
dentry
*
cached_lookup
(
struct
dentry
*
parent
,
struct
qstr
*
name
,
struct
nameidata
*
nd
)
{
struct
dentry
*
dentry
=
__d_lookup
(
parent
,
name
);
/* lockess __d_lookup may fail due to concurrent d_move()
* in some unrelated directory, so try with d_lookup
*/
if
(
!
dentry
)
dentry
=
d_lookup
(
parent
,
name
);
if
(
dentry
&&
dentry
->
d_op
&&
dentry
->
d_op
->
d_revalidate
)
dentry
=
do_revalidate
(
dentry
,
nd
);
return
dentry
;
}
/*
* Short-cut version of permission(), for calling by
* path_walk(), when dcache lock is held. Combines parts
...
...
@@ -463,70 +443,6 @@ static int exec_permission_lite(struct inode *inode)
return
security_inode_permission
(
inode
,
MAY_EXEC
);
}
/*
* This is called when everything else fails, and we actually have
* to go to the low-level filesystem to find out what we should do..
*
* We get the directory semaphore, and after getting that we also
* make sure that nobody added the entry to the dcache in the meantime..
* SMP-safe
*/
static
struct
dentry
*
real_lookup
(
struct
dentry
*
parent
,
struct
qstr
*
name
,
struct
nameidata
*
nd
)
{
struct
dentry
*
result
;
struct
inode
*
dir
=
parent
->
d_inode
;
mutex_lock
(
&
dir
->
i_mutex
);
/*
* First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created
* while we waited for the directory semaphore..
*
* FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to
* avoid unnecessary cache lookups.
*
* The "dcache_lock" is purely to protect the RCU list walker
* from concurrent renames at this point (we mustn't get false
* negatives from the RCU list walk here, unlike the optimistic
* fast walk).
*
* so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
*/
result
=
d_lookup
(
parent
,
name
);
if
(
!
result
)
{
struct
dentry
*
dentry
;
/* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
result
=
ERR_PTR
(
-
ENOENT
);
if
(
IS_DEADDIR
(
dir
))
goto
out_unlock
;
dentry
=
d_alloc
(
parent
,
name
);
result
=
ERR_PTR
(
-
ENOMEM
);
if
(
dentry
)
{
result
=
dir
->
i_op
->
lookup
(
dir
,
dentry
,
nd
);
if
(
result
)
dput
(
dentry
);
else
result
=
dentry
;
}
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock
(
&
dir
->
i_mutex
);
return
result
;
}
/*
* Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
* we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
*/
mutex_unlock
(
&
dir
->
i_mutex
);
if
(
result
->
d_op
&&
result
->
d_op
->
d_revalidate
)
{
result
=
do_revalidate
(
result
,
nd
);
if
(
!
result
)
result
=
ERR_PTR
(
-
ENOENT
);
}
return
result
;
}
static
__always_inline
void
set_root
(
struct
nameidata
*
nd
)
{
if
(
!
nd
->
root
.
mnt
)
{
...
...
@@ -767,7 +683,8 @@ static int do_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name,
struct
path
*
path
)
{
struct
vfsmount
*
mnt
=
nd
->
path
.
mnt
;
struct
dentry
*
dentry
;
struct
dentry
*
dentry
,
*
parent
;
struct
inode
*
dir
;
/*
* See if the low-level filesystem might want
* to use its own hash..
...
...
@@ -790,7 +707,59 @@ static int do_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name,
return
0
;
need_lookup:
dentry
=
real_lookup
(
nd
->
path
.
dentry
,
name
,
nd
);
parent
=
nd
->
path
.
dentry
;
dir
=
parent
->
d_inode
;
mutex_lock
(
&
dir
->
i_mutex
);
/*
* First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created
* while we waited for the directory semaphore..
*
* FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to
* avoid unnecessary cache lookups.
*
* The "dcache_lock" is purely to protect the RCU list walker
* from concurrent renames at this point (we mustn't get false
* negatives from the RCU list walk here, unlike the optimistic
* fast walk).
*
* so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
*/
dentry
=
d_lookup
(
parent
,
name
);
if
(
!
dentry
)
{
struct
dentry
*
new
;
/* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
dentry
=
ERR_PTR
(
-
ENOENT
);
if
(
IS_DEADDIR
(
dir
))
goto
out_unlock
;
new
=
d_alloc
(
parent
,
name
);
dentry
=
ERR_PTR
(
-
ENOMEM
);
if
(
new
)
{
dentry
=
dir
->
i_op
->
lookup
(
dir
,
new
,
nd
);
if
(
dentry
)
dput
(
new
);
else
dentry
=
new
;
}
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock
(
&
dir
->
i_mutex
);
if
(
IS_ERR
(
dentry
))
goto
fail
;
goto
done
;
}
/*
* Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
* we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
*/
mutex_unlock
(
&
dir
->
i_mutex
);
if
(
dentry
->
d_op
&&
dentry
->
d_op
->
d_revalidate
)
{
dentry
=
do_revalidate
(
dentry
,
nd
);
if
(
!
dentry
)
dentry
=
ERR_PTR
(
-
ENOENT
);
}
if
(
IS_ERR
(
dentry
))
goto
fail
;
goto
done
;
...
...
@@ -1144,7 +1113,17 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name,
goto
out
;
}
dentry
=
cached_lookup
(
base
,
name
,
nd
);
dentry
=
__d_lookup
(
base
,
name
);
/* lockess __d_lookup may fail due to concurrent d_move()
* in some unrelated directory, so try with d_lookup
*/
if
(
!
dentry
)
dentry
=
d_lookup
(
base
,
name
);
if
(
dentry
&&
dentry
->
d_op
&&
dentry
->
d_op
->
d_revalidate
)
dentry
=
do_revalidate
(
dentry
,
nd
);
if
(
!
dentry
)
{
struct
dentry
*
new
;
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment