drm/msm/kms: Make a lock_class_key for each crtc mutex
Lockdep complains about an AA deadlock when rebooting the device. base-commit: 19c329f6 ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.4.91 #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- reboot/5213 is trying to acquire lock: ffffff80d13391b0 (&kms->commit_lock[i]){+.+.}, at: lock_crtcs+0x60/0xa4 but task is already holding lock: ffffff80d1339110 (&kms->commit_lock[i]){+.+.}, at: lock_crtcs+0x60/0xa4 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&kms->commit_lock[i]); lock(&kms->commit_lock[i]); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by reboot/5213: __arm64_sys_reboot+0x148/0x2a0 device_shutdown+0x10c/0x2c4 drm_atomic_helper_shutdown+0x48/0xfc modeset_lock+0x120/0x24c lock_crtcs+0x60/0xa4 stack backtrace: CPU: 4 PID: 5213 Comm: reboot Not tainted 5.4.91 #1 Hardware name: Google Pompom (rev1) with LTE (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1dc show_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack+0xfc/0x1a8 __lock_acquire+0xcd0/0x22b8 lock_acquire+0x1ec/0x240 __mutex_lock_common+0xe0/0xc84 mutex_lock_nested+0x48/0x58 lock_crtcs+0x60/0xa4 msm_atomic_commit_tail+0x348/0x570 commit_tail+0xdc/0x178 drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x160/0x168 drm_atomic_commit+0x68/0x80 This is because lockdep thinks all the locks taken in lock_crtcs() are the same lock, when they actually aren't. That's because we call mutex_init() in msm_kms_init() and that assigns one static key for every lock initialized in this loop. Let's allocate a dynamic number of lock_class_keys and assign them to each lock so that lockdep can figure out an AA deadlock isn't possible here. Fixes: b3d91800 ("drm/msm: Fix race condition in msm driver with async layer updates") Cc: Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment