Commit 706b23bd authored by Mathieu Desnoyers's avatar Mathieu Desnoyers Committed by Linus Torvalds

Fix: kernel/ptrace.c: ptrace_peek_siginfo() missing __put_user() validation

This __put_user() could be used by unprivileged processes to write into
kernel memory.  The issue here is that even if copy_siginfo_to_user()
fails, the error code is not checked before __put_user() is executed.

Luckily, ptrace_peek_siginfo() has been added within the 3.10-rc cycle,
so it has not hit a stable release yet.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent bd2931b5
...@@ -665,20 +665,22 @@ static int ptrace_peek_siginfo(struct task_struct *child, ...@@ -665,20 +665,22 @@ static int ptrace_peek_siginfo(struct task_struct *child,
if (unlikely(is_compat_task())) { if (unlikely(is_compat_task())) {
compat_siginfo_t __user *uinfo = compat_ptr(data); compat_siginfo_t __user *uinfo = compat_ptr(data);
ret = copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info); if (copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info) ||
ret |= __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code); __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
break;
}
} else } else
#endif #endif
{ {
siginfo_t __user *uinfo = (siginfo_t __user *) data; siginfo_t __user *uinfo = (siginfo_t __user *) data;
ret = copy_siginfo_to_user(uinfo, &info); if (copy_siginfo_to_user(uinfo, &info) ||
ret |= __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code); __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code)) {
} ret = -EFAULT;
break;
if (ret) { }
ret = -EFAULT;
break;
} }
data += sizeof(siginfo_t); data += sizeof(siginfo_t);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment