Commit 71c748b5 authored by Baochen Qiang's avatar Baochen Qiang Committed by Kalle Valo

ath11k: Fix unexpected return buffer manager error for QCA6390

We are seeing below error on QCA6390:
...
[70211.671189] ath11k_pci 0000:72:00.0: failed to parse rx error in wbm_rel ring desc -22
[70212.696154] ath11k_pci 0000:72:00.0: failed to parse rx error in wbm_rel ring desc -22
[70213.092941] ath11k_pci 0000:72:00.0: failed to parse rx error in wbm_rel ring desc -22
...

The reason is that, with commit 734223d7 ("ath11k: change return
buffer manager for QCA6390"), ath11k expects the return buffer manager
(RBM) field of descriptor configured as HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW1_BM when
parsing error frames from WBM2SW3_RELEASE ring. This is a wrong change
cause the RBM field is set as HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW3_BM.

The same issue also applies to REO2TCL ring though we have not got any
error reported.

Fix it by changing RBM from HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW1_BM to HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW3_BM
for these two rings.

Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1

Fixes: 734223d7 ("ath11k: change return buffer manager for QCA6390")
Signed-off-by: default avatarBaochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211222013536.582527-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com
parent 42da1cc7
......@@ -3837,7 +3837,7 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx_err(struct ath11k_base *ab, struct napi_struct *napi,
ath11k_hal_rx_msdu_link_info_get(link_desc_va, &num_msdus, msdu_cookies,
&rbm);
if (rbm != HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_WBM_IDLE_DESC_LIST &&
rbm != ab->hw_params.hal_params->rx_buf_rbm) {
rbm != HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW3_BM) {
ab->soc_stats.invalid_rbm++;
ath11k_warn(ab, "invalid return buffer manager %d\n", rbm);
ath11k_dp_rx_link_desc_return(ab, desc,
......
......@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ int ath11k_hal_wbm_desc_parse_err(struct ath11k_base *ab, void *desc,
ret_buf_mgr = FIELD_GET(BUFFER_ADDR_INFO1_RET_BUF_MGR,
wbm_desc->buf_addr_info.info1);
if (ret_buf_mgr != ab->hw_params.hal_params->rx_buf_rbm) {
if (ret_buf_mgr != HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW3_BM) {
ab->soc_stats.invalid_rbm++;
return -EINVAL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment