Commit 71cf5aee authored by Mathias Krause's avatar Mathias Krause Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

kernel, cpu: Remove bogus __ref annotations

cpu_chain lost its __cpuinitdata annotation long ago in commit
5c113fbe ("fix cpu_chain section mismatch..."). This and the global
__cpuinit annotation drop in v3.11 vanished the need to mark all users,
including transitive ones, with the __ref annotation. Just get rid of it
to not wrongly hide section mismatches.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent eda5867b
......@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ void cpu_hotplug_enable(void)
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
/* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */
int __ref register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
int ret;
cpu_maps_update_begin();
......@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int __ref register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
return ret;
}
int __ref __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
int __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return raw_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
}
......@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void cpu_notify_nofail(unsigned long val, void *v)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__register_cpu_notifier);
void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
cpu_maps_update_begin();
raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
......@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
void __ref __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
void __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
}
......@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct take_cpu_down_param {
};
/* Take this CPU down. */
static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_param)
static int take_cpu_down(void *_param)
{
struct take_cpu_down_param *param = _param;
int err;
......@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_param)
}
/* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
{
int err, nr_calls = 0;
void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
......@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
return err;
}
int __ref cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
{
int err;
......@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ void __weak arch_enable_nonboot_cpus_end(void)
{
}
void __ref enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
int cpu, error;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment