Commit 7277a34c authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/fair: Better document newidle_balance()

Whilst chasing the pick_next_task() race, there was some confusion
about the newidle_balance() return values. Document them.

[ mingo: Minor edits. ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: ktkhai@virtuozzo.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: qais.yousef@arm.com
Cc: qperret@google.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108131909.488364308@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 6d5a763c
......@@ -9941,6 +9941,11 @@ static inline void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) { }
/*
* idle_balance is called by schedule() if this_cpu is about to become
* idle. Attempts to pull tasks from other CPUs.
*
* Returns:
* < 0 - we released the lock and there are !fair tasks present
* 0 - failed, no new tasks
* > 0 - success, new (fair) tasks present
*/
int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment